Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Letters

by Personnel Today 6 Aug 2002
by Personnel Today 6 Aug 2002

This week’s Letters

E-mails should be monitored

An organisation should have the right to protect its reputation and itself
from litigation through staff monitoring (News, 16 July).

In the future, will the courts accept that libellous remarks, or other
e-abuse, cannot be attributed to the company the mail has been sent from, as
the monitoring code has removed their right to avoid this happening?

And there are other issues that are not being discussed, such as resources
and security threats.

Must organisations not monitor for executable files (often virus carriers),
software (could be unlicensed), MP3 files (often infringing copyright), and
large picture files? All of these could present threats to a network, cause
extreme congestion and use vital bandwidth affecting the normal running of a
business network.

Anyone who deals with e-mail systems will be aware of the growth of large
file transfers via e-mail and that these are all too often either virus
infected, music files or audible/video ‘jokes’.

Companies must be allowed to protect their networks and computer resources.
I work in the front line of the e-mail world and I’ve had all these issues to
deal with – if the guidelines remain as they are, companies will pay dearly as
many people cannot be trusted to adhere to the rules.

Rob Jinman
IT manager, Via e-mail

Board must be actively involved

I was interested in your articles on boardroom HR (News, 23 July),
especially in the light of my recent appointment to the board of 24seven
Vending.

In my experience, the key to boardroom status lies in being actively
involved in every part of the business, from the factory floor to the
boardroom. This includes taking on other areas of responsibility not strictly
within the traditional realm of HR.

I think a recent comment by our chairman on the monthly HR board paper shows
how HR can gain influence. "I always look forward to reading your report –
it tells me what’s actually going on in the business and links what we know we
are trying to achieve to meet customer needs to what people are thinking and
doing in the business to help us achieve our goals," he said.

Over the past two or three years, my company has gone through periods of
rapid growth, followed by consolidation. We could not have done this without
the board being aware of how these changes affect the people in our business,
especially in such a labour intensive market.

Ann Burton
HR director, 24seven Vending

Defending the HR profession

It is not often that an article disturbs my breakfast; however,
‘Would the real HR staff please stand up’ (Comment, 23 July) had me on my feet,
toast flying.

There has been a trail of writers ready to have a condemnatory
stab at a function that has battled to change its image and role within
business.

Are we making an impact? Should we be called HR or personnel?
Are we sufficiently qualified to breathe the same air as those elevated to the
board? The debate goes on, while HR and personnel managers alike do their best
to deliver a service that supports the business needs of their organisation.

This is often not fully supported by either senior or line
management, and now seemingly not by their colleagues in the profession either.

Paul Kearns’ experience of HR and personnel people clearly
differs from mine. I believe the majority of those practising share a desire to
do the best for their organisation, and will rise to the challenge, with
support. Real HR people seek to develop, stretch and motivate those around
them, not damn them for their current status.

So, if his views are symptomatic of the ‘real’ HR populace,
count me out.  In fact, count me out
anyway, because I just left my group HR manager position of seven years feeling
pretty confident, strategically involved and making no excuses for choosing to
move into coaching.  

Dorothy Smith, MA, MCIPD,
Beaconsfield

How do you measure up?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

With reference to Paul Kearns’ comment pieces for Personnel
Today. I would be interested to know how he measures the impact of what he
does, and how is he performing against these measures?

Joanne Miles
Southampton

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Government’s science strategy will fail say experts
next post
Pressure builds for tribunal ‘shake-up’

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+