Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

STEMApprenticeshipsLatest NewsSkills shortagesTraining delivery

Manufacturers call for more time to use apprenticeship levy funds

by Ashleigh Webber 3 May 2018
by Ashleigh Webber 3 May 2018 Cultura/REX/Shutterstock
Cultura/REX/Shutterstock

The Government should extend the timeframe employers have to spend their apprenticeship levy funds from 24 to 48 months – the average length of an engineering apprenticeship – to avoid manufacturing businesses losing their apprenticeship funding.

Manufacturers’ organisation EEF said the industry was being penalised for not recruiting on a “straight-line, annual basis”, with many smaller organisations recruiting apprentices every two to three years.

It argued that the requirement for employers to use their apprenticeship funds within two years meant that manufacturers were immediately at a disadvantage.

Apprenticeship levy

What is the apprenticeship levy?

What can employers spend apprenticeship levy funding on?

Its report, A levy price to pay, also claimed that the levy had forced many manufacturers to delay starting apprenticeship programmes or scale back opportunities because the current system did not meet their needs.

It said: “The cost of this is young people having their training pushed back and delayed. It is therefore clear that leaving the levy in its current form is leading to missed opportunities for manufacturers to expand the number apprenticeships they offer.”

Four in 10 (43%) manufacturers said it was a challenge finding apprenticeships that met their specialist needs, while 41% found colleges were unwilling to provide apprenticeships they wanted.

One respondent to EEF’s survey said training providers were “refusing to deliver apprenticeships to small numbers of apprentices (three or less)”, while another claimed that they were “struggling to find providers for all the training we require under the apprenticeship banner”.

Two in five found the requirement for 20% of training to be delivered “off the job” was an issue. The report argued that meeting the “off the job” requirement did not concern manufacturers before the levy was introduced in April 2017, because they had traditionally offered four-year-long engineering apprenticeships.

“What the levy has led to, however, is companies thinking about how else they can utilise their levy monies, for example on existing employees. Indeed our data points towards companies looking to offer apprenticeships outside of engineering for their existing employees, and this is where this challenges have arisen,” it claimed.

More than half (52%) of manufacturers would like the apprenticeship levy to be improved in some way. Only 17% wanted to see it scrapped completely.

A quarter suggested that a broader training levy payable by all businesses would be more beneficial.

EEF also recommended that the Government expanded incentive payments to employers, providers and learners in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects, to help close the STEM skills gap.

Other recommendations included:

  • increasing the amount of unused apprenticeship levy funds employers can transfer to another organisation to more than 50% (currently 10%);
  • allowing employers to agree a payment schedule with their training provider;
  • improve the process of signing off apprenticeship standards, so it is quicker and more transparent; and
  • reviewing the current maximum funding band of £27,000, which EEF claimed “does not scratch the surface when looking at the true cost of training an engineering apprentice”.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

EEF said: “It is time to get the levy back on track and Government must act urgently to make this happen. As a sector that has been committed to training apprentices for decades, the levy has caused great frustrations.

“Manufacturers are willing to throw Government a lifeline and turn things back around but they aren’t willing to take a wait and see approach.”

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Mobiles and machines: How L&D must move forward to drive performance
next post
Morrisons case: employers’ responsibilities in preventing malicious data leaks

You may also like

Teacher apprenticeship route to be tied to school...

9 May 2025

High-level apprenticeship spend doubles in five years

16 Apr 2025

‘Clean power army’ to create thousands of jobs

7 Apr 2025

HR and businesses respond to Spring Statement

26 Mar 2025

Why the apprenticeship shakeup is good news for...

20 Mar 2025

Lower socio-economic background graduates ‘overlooked’ in hiring

7 Mar 2025

National Apprenticeship Week: Transforming the role of skills

14 Feb 2025

The future of apprenticeships: Why higher wages are...

14 Feb 2025

Tesco pledges 1,500 apprenticeship places by 2027

12 Feb 2025

Shorter, more flexible apprenticeships revealed by government

11 Feb 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+