Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

STEMApprenticeshipsLatest NewsSkills shortagesTraining delivery

Manufacturers call for more time to use apprenticeship levy funds

by Ashleigh Webber 3 May 2018
by Ashleigh Webber 3 May 2018 Cultura/REX/Shutterstock
Cultura/REX/Shutterstock

The Government should extend the timeframe employers have to spend their apprenticeship levy funds from 24 to 48 months – the average length of an engineering apprenticeship – to avoid manufacturing businesses losing their apprenticeship funding.

Manufacturers’ organisation EEF said the industry was being penalised for not recruiting on a “straight-line, annual basis”, with many smaller organisations recruiting apprentices every two to three years.

It argued that the requirement for employers to use their apprenticeship funds within two years meant that manufacturers were immediately at a disadvantage.

Apprenticeship levy

What is the apprenticeship levy?

What can employers spend apprenticeship levy funding on?

Its report, A levy price to pay, also claimed that the levy had forced many manufacturers to delay starting apprenticeship programmes or scale back opportunities because the current system did not meet their needs.

It said: “The cost of this is young people having their training pushed back and delayed. It is therefore clear that leaving the levy in its current form is leading to missed opportunities for manufacturers to expand the number apprenticeships they offer.”

Four in 10 (43%) manufacturers said it was a challenge finding apprenticeships that met their specialist needs, while 41% found colleges were unwilling to provide apprenticeships they wanted.

One respondent to EEF’s survey said training providers were “refusing to deliver apprenticeships to small numbers of apprentices (three or less)”, while another claimed that they were “struggling to find providers for all the training we require under the apprenticeship banner”.

Two in five found the requirement for 20% of training to be delivered “off the job” was an issue. The report argued that meeting the “off the job” requirement did not concern manufacturers before the levy was introduced in April 2017, because they had traditionally offered four-year-long engineering apprenticeships.

“What the levy has led to, however, is companies thinking about how else they can utilise their levy monies, for example on existing employees. Indeed our data points towards companies looking to offer apprenticeships outside of engineering for their existing employees, and this is where this challenges have arisen,” it claimed.

More than half (52%) of manufacturers would like the apprenticeship levy to be improved in some way. Only 17% wanted to see it scrapped completely.

A quarter suggested that a broader training levy payable by all businesses would be more beneficial.

EEF also recommended that the Government expanded incentive payments to employers, providers and learners in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects, to help close the STEM skills gap.

Other recommendations included:

  • increasing the amount of unused apprenticeship levy funds employers can transfer to another organisation to more than 50% (currently 10%);
  • allowing employers to agree a payment schedule with their training provider;
  • improve the process of signing off apprenticeship standards, so it is quicker and more transparent; and
  • reviewing the current maximum funding band of £27,000, which EEF claimed “does not scratch the surface when looking at the true cost of training an engineering apprentice”.

EEF said: “It is time to get the levy back on track and Government must act urgently to make this happen. As a sector that has been committed to training apprentices for decades, the levy has caused great frustrations.

“Manufacturers are willing to throw Government a lifeline and turn things back around but they aren’t willing to take a wait and see approach.”

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport magazines, touching on some of the employment and wellbeing issues experienced by those in road haulage.

previous post
Mobiles and machines: How L&D must move forward to drive performance
next post
Morrisons case: employers’ responsibilities in preventing malicious data leaks

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Entry requirements prevent young accessing apprenticeships

20 Jun 2022

Hidden disabilities: Could apprenticeships open up access?

17 Jun 2022

How career pathways can attract and retain talent

13 Jun 2022

MPs threaten supply chain levy if HGV driver...

1 Jun 2022

Would a general training levy solve the UK...

1 Jun 2022

‘Inequality is embedded in our labour market’ says...

27 May 2022

More than £1bn of upskilling loan money has...

26 May 2022

Green energy jobs given lift by new Delivery...

12 May 2022

Future Skills Unit ‘will help learners make better...

8 Apr 2022

Half of employers want to replace apprenticeship levy...

7 Apr 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+