Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

HR practiceYardstick Update

Most HR departments measure what they do

by Mark Crail 11 Jun 2007
by Mark Crail 11 Jun 2007

One in three HR departments makes no attempt to measure how effective its interventions are, according to a study by Personnel Today’s sister publication, Employment Review.


The survey of 188 organisations, which together have more than 785,000 employees, found that just 28% had a formal system of metrics to measure the work of their HR departments. A further 41% used “informal measures”, and 32% had no measurements at all.


The figures show that larger organisations and those in the public sector are far more likely to adopt formal methods of assessing HR effectiveness.


Just 14% of organisations with less than 250 employees used formal measures, compared with 23% of those with 250 to 999 employees, and 42% of those with 1,000 or more employees.


One in four (23%) of the largest organisations did not measure HR at all, compared with four out of 10 (41%) of the smallest organisations.


Employers in the public sector (42%) were twice as likely to use formal measures as those in manufacturing industries (19%). One in four private sector services firms used formal measures.


No attempt was made to gauge HR effectiveness in 47% of manufacturing firms, 31% of private sector services firms, or 23% of public sector organisations.


Least measured think they’re great…


HR departments in public sector organisations are most likely to see themselves as being ineffective or, at best, average.


Those in smaller organisations were most likely to rate themselves as above average, the survey shows.


Respondents were asked to rate their HR department on a scale of one to five, where one was low and five was high, on the basis of the measures used by their own organisation.


Overall, 51% rated themselves at levels one to three, and 49% at levels four and five. These categories were then used to denote “ineffective” and “effective” HR departments.


On this basis, six out of 10 HR departments (60%) in organisations with less than 250 employees rated themselves as effective, compared with under half of those with between 250 and 999 employees (41%) and of those with 1,000 or more employees (46%).


Just over half (53%) of the private sector services firms considered that their HR departments were effective, compared with just under half (48%) of manufacturing companies, and rather fewer public sector organisations (43%).


…but effective HR has different priorities


Effective and ineffective HR departments are driven by different internal and external forces in two main areas, the Employment Review research shows.


Effective HR departments are nearly twice as likely to regard communication with employees as exerting a great deal of influence over their work priorities, and nearly twice as likely to believe that they themselves have a substantial amount of control over their own working priorities within the organisation.


Although ineffective HR departments are significantly more likely to see government funding opportunities as a key driving force behind which areas gain greater focus, this is not likely to be the case for all HR professionals. It is likely that this reflects the relatively low effectiveness scores those HR practitioners in the public sector awarded themselves.


And while organisations of all types and sizes identified many of the same priorities, those with effective HR departments were significantly more likely to see training, work-life balance and stress as important areas of work.


Click here for more information

Avatar
Mark Crail

Mark Crail is content director of XpertHR. He leads the salary survey and HR data benchmarking services, overseeing the collection and publication of pay data through the Job Pricing tool and our wider HR research programme which forms the core of XpertHR Benchmarking.

previous post
Unions call for Remploy HR team to resign after factory closures were announced to staff by DVD
next post
Cutting carbon emissions: engaging employees in the crusade

You may also like

Hot summers, hot desks – employment law advice...

12 Aug 2022

Frasers Group scraps Friday working from home policy

15 Jul 2022

Netherlands on track to approve working from home...

7 Jul 2022

Employment law changes for 2022 and beyond: update...

1 Jul 2022

Four-day week: what are the legal considerations for...

28 Jun 2022

Sickness absence rate in 2021 was highest in...

8 Jun 2022

Right-to-work: first digital identity check providers revealed

6 Jun 2022

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

5 Jun 2022

Does a four day week work? Charlotte Lockhart...

1 Jun 2022

Hybrid working will ‘never be perfect’, finds report

31 May 2022
  • 6 reasons why work-based learning is better than traditional training PROMOTED | A recent Fortune/Deloitte survey found that 71% of CEOs are anticipating that this year’s biggest business disrupter...Read more
  • Strengthening Scotland’s public services through virtual recruiting PROMOTED | This website is Scotland's go-to place for job seekers looking to apply for roles in public services...Read more
  • What’s next for L&D? Enter Alchemist… PROMOTED | It’s time to turn off the tedious and get ready for interactive and immersive learning experiences...Read more
  • Simple mistakes are blighting the onboarding experience PROMOTED | The onboarding of new hires is a company’s best chance...Read more
  • Preventing Burnout: How can HR help key workers get the right help? PROMOTED | Workplace wellbeing may seem a distant memory...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+