Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Rest periods

Must employers pay for time spent on premises?

by Personnel Today 23 Sep 2003
by Personnel Today 23 Sep 2003

An ECJ ruling that workers should be paid if employers require them to be on
call is likely to have important implications under the Working Times
Regulations

Decisions in two important cases in
the last few weeks have again focused attention on the definition of ‘working
time’. Both relate to on-call hours.

It was reported that the London Borough of Harrow was considering an appeal
after losing a case brought by live-in wardens of sheltered homes for the
elderly. The wardens worked a basic 37-hour week, but were required to be on
call 24 hours a day, five days a week. This impacted on their social and family
lives, and led to social isolation.

The tribunal concluded on-call hours were to be considered as working hours,
for which the wardens were entitled to be paid, and that they should be
entitled to proper daily rest as set out in the Working Time Regulations.

Any appeal by Harrow would appear to be doomed in the light of the latest
decision from the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In Norbert Jaeger v
Landeshauptstadt Kiel, the court revisited the issue of the treatment of the
working hours of doctors on call, which it had previously addressed in the
Sindicato de Medicos de Asistencia Publica v Conselleria de Sanidad y Consumo
de la Generalidad Valenciana (SIMAP) C-303/98 case. In the latter case, Spanish
junior doctors obtained a ruling that being on call at their place of
employment constitutes working time.

In Jaeger, a question arose that had not been dealt with in SIMAP. On-call
doctors had their own room with a bed in the hospital, where they might sleep
when not called out to attend to patients. The court was asked whether all
on-call duty, even time spent asleep, must be treated as working time.

The court followed the opinion of the Advocate General and agreed that it
should. It ruled that the decisive factor in defining working time in relation
to doctors on call in the hospital itself, is whether they are required to be at
the place determined by the employer, and available to provide their services
immediately if the employer needs them.

What are the wider implications of these cases for other employers? Any
employer who has staff on stand-by should have a fresh look at the terms it
imposes on those workers.

If they are constrained to remain on, or very close to the employer’s
premises, there may be a working time issue. This depends on whether there are
significant constraints on the employee being able to pursue leisure interests
or family life.

Employers in local government and the NHS need to re-appraise their on-call
practices immediately if they are to avoid risking tribunal proceedings with
corresponding, potentially significant claims for back-pay for on-call time
that should have been classified as working time, but was unpaid.

More complication looms on the horizon for NHS employers as, from 1 August
2004, junior doctors’ hours will be constrained to 58 hours per week, and all
rest periods will apply.

There will have to be a wholesale rethink of the current arrangements, and
maybe we will see employers asking doctors to sign opt-outs – providing
opt-outs are still available.

A further issue, which may arise, is whether those working at night will be
classified as night workers and therefore subject to a maximum eight-hour
shift.

In the meantime, the London Borough of Harrow may wish to concentrate its
energies on negotiating opt-outs with its sheltered homes wardens.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

There will be a price to pay for additional wages, but the reality of
recruiting additional workers to cover all the 76 on-call hours, which it had
previously demanded of its wardens, may make the use of opt-outs more
realistic, at least in the short-term.

By John Evans, Head of employment, Coudert Brothers,
London

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Engineers pay deals sink to 12-month low
next post
Amsterdam prize winner

You may also like

What can UK businesses expect from a ‘right...

9 Sep 2024

Right to switch off would boost productivity –...

20 Aug 2024

Police team’s on-call hours are ‘working time’, tribunal...

26 Jun 2024

How are working time records changing in the...

12 May 2023

Conservatives: Seven proposals that could impact HR

5 Oct 2022

Truss considering overhaul of working time rules

5 Sep 2022

Extension of drivers’ hours faces backlash

8 Jul 2021

Uber recognises union for first time

27 May 2021

Number of NHS doctors looking to retire early...

4 May 2021

NHS staff won’t ‘bounce back’ without support

24 Mar 2021

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+