Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

HR practiceDress codesOpinion

Off Message: would strict dress codes make a difference?

by Tony Pettengell 20 Nov 2007
by Tony Pettengell 20 Nov 2007

When Mark Twain penned the immortal line “Clothes make the man”, little did he realise how important that single statement would turn out to be in the world of work.

With the human resources (HR) profession’s leading awards night just days away – that’s the Personnel Today Awards 2007, in case you’re wondering – all thoughts in HR offices across the land will be directed towards what to wear, what not to wear, what other people will be wearing, and sartorial disasters of past events.

Being a man, the choice is simple: black tie – not just a tie, you understand, but the whole suit and dress shirt too. But for the female majority, the choice is not so limited. But why should that be? And could it be that this ‘choice’ contributes to the inequalities suffered by the female of the species in the workplace – both in terms of pay and seniority?

Shoe fetish

On the face of it, that would seem unlikely, for surely we live in a meritocracy where people only get into positions of power on merit, on account of their vast amounts of experience, due to their numerous and relevant qualifications.

But is this really the case?

A glance around the boardrooms of the nation would suggest that men are much smarter, brighter and more qualified than women. Clearly this is not true. But what they definitely are is more blandly dressed suited and booted, yes, but in a decidedly ‘grey’ kind of way.

When women do get to positions of power or take up high-profile jobs, it is what they wear and what they look like that generates as much, if not more, comment as what they actually say or do.

When Tory MP Teresa May stands up to speak, nobody listens to what she has to say. Apart from other, more obvious causes, the main reason is that their gaze falls to her feet, to see her latest bad-taste footwear selection. Any subsequent reports of what she had to say are dominated by comments on her fashion sense, or lack of it, and her predilection for leopard-print kitten heels.

The bland leading the brand

And the media is even harder on its own (especially in TV land), with women presenters promoted on account of their blondeness – and quite possibly their blandness – rather than their ability, as demonstrated by the seemingly endless crop of ‘robot babes’ in posh frocks populating our TV screens with their inane chatter.

There are women who get on as a result of their abilities, but as Moira Stewart recently found to her cost, looks and sartorial elegance are not enough when you are a mere woman – age becomes an issue. So while newsreaders like Martyn Lewis and Huw Edwards can get away with crumpled suits and crumpled faces, the women know their days are numbered.

Is this lookism, ageism, or just good old sexism? Of course, there are many ‘isms’ lurking in the shadows just waiting to jump out and bite the unwary HR practitioner on the bottom, as it were. Racism, fattism, heightism, crucifixism – you name it, there now seems to be an ‘ism’ for every occasion.

And with every ‘ism’, there’s someone taking an employer to court with a bad bout of tribunalism – as in the ongoing case of British Airways (BA) check-in clerk Nadia Eweida, who is still getting all shirty about needing to wear a crucifix to work.

No doubt whichever side wins will indulge in a bit of triumphalism.

But can what you wear really be that important? Could ‘lookism’ really be one of the most powerful tools in the corporate scabbard?

The marketeers would have us believe that image is everything and that the brand is king. And there is no doubt that the employer brand – as embodied by its employees – is becoming increasingly important. First impressions do count.

And nothing quite exercises the mind of the average British worker like a discussion about clothes – who’s wearing what, what’s in, what’s not, what’s decidedly cool, what’s incredibly hot?

Stitched up

BA actually softened its dress code to allow Eweida to wear her cross, and all it got for its trouble was a slap in the face and a further invitation to the courthouse. So perhaps it would have been wiser to implement a stricter dress code, a code where no jewellery would be allowed, a code that made everyone dress the same, in the same bland colours and styles.

If men and women were forced to wear the same clothes, would sexism in the workplace be as rife? Would ageism matter quite as much? Just think back to the 1950s when boys were besuited from the age of 10, where boys looked like men, men looked like men and old men looked like… well… men. They all wore the same uniform and as a result they all acted in the same uniform manner.

Suited – not booted

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

So as we stride manfully/womanfully towards the second decade of the 21st century – kitted out in our Armani/Hugo Boss/Jaeger/Next/Moss Bros/M&S* (*delete as appropriate) machine washable ultra-grey two-piece ensemble with added pockets – the dress code could be the making of us.

For in a world where the list of ‘isms’ grows ever larger by the day, it seems that a neatly stitched, Sta-Prest, buttoned-down dress code could be all that is required to keep the wolf from the door – especially if it’s wearing a sheepskin coat.

Tony Pettengell

previous post
Letters: Equal pay, Work-life balance and Age discrimination
next post
Cash-strapped Cumbria council hires new human resources director to steady the ship

You may also like

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

Eight ways to best support grieving employees

6 May 2025

Leading with honest feedback: A responsibility in recruitment

24 Apr 2025

Exploring the best London office locations for ‘Zillennials’

16 Apr 2025

Remote working isn’t bad – it just needs...

1 Apr 2025

What do HR specialists enjoy most about their...

21 Mar 2025

Sexual harassment: Employees have the right to protection...

18 Mar 2025

Workspace flexibility: Optimising your office needs for purpose

11 Mar 2025

Should HR worry about idea theft in the...

11 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+