Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

BonusesPay & benefits

Pay banker bonuses or count the cost

by Ronnie Fox 10 Oct 2008
by Ronnie Fox 10 Oct 2008

With bank shares in freefall, everyone is looking for someone or something to blame. City bonuses have become the target of renewed attention from the government and the FSA (Financial Services Authority). They say big bonuses encourage excessive risk taking, which has brought banks to their knees. But what does this focus on “excessive” bonuses mean for the banks?

The FSA is proposing to ask banks to explain their bonus structures. If it thinks a bank’s bonus structure makes it a risky institution, the bank could be required to increase the amount of capital that it holds, which will cost the banks more, and sounds like a response to government pressure.

But the banks pay bonuses to reward good performance and to attract and retain talent, and while thousands of people work in the financial services sector, the number of those capable of generating significant profit is quite small.

The market is extremely competitive, with skilled bankers commanding big rewards and ready to move on to chase financial compensation. So if the government or the FSA interferes with the bonuses that banks can pay, banks will find it harder to incentivise excellent performance and keep their best people at the time when they need them most.

In the financial services sector, basic salaries tend to be relatively modest. Bonuses reward strong performance and are usually proportionate to the amount of profit generated. This aligns the interests of the bankers with the interests of the shareholders, which must be a good thing.

Ill-informed politicians argue that bankers take risks that pay-off in the short-term without regard for the long-term negative consequences for the business. The bankers get paid their big bonuses at the end of the financial year and it may not be until later that problems emerge.

But banks are alive to this criticism and most pay at least part of their bonuses in shares through long-term incentive schemes, often with claw-back arrangements. This encourages bankers to take a longer-term interest in the success of the business. These schemes usually provide that the individual will lose their entitlement to the reward payment if they leave the bank before the payment is actually made (which is often years later). This has the added advantage of encouraging the bankers who have performed well and earned the bonuses to stay with the bank.

Although long-term incentive schemes have clear advantages for the banks, they have recently become less popular with employees who have watched their hard-earned bonuses evaporate as share prices have crashed. It is said that more than $30bn of Lehman Brothers shares were held by its employees. A true sharing of risk. Bonuses paid in cold hard cash look more attractive than ever and the top talent will be going where the cash is. If the banks want them, they will have to be willing to pay.

In the current climate, financial institutions are under intense pressure from all sides. When it comes to paying bonuses, they will have tough decisions to make.

Some banks have bonus schemes that are totally discretionary. However, these banks could still face legal action from employees unless they can show that, when deciding on the size of bonuses they did not exercise their discretion in a way which was “irrational or perverse – ie, if no other reasonable bank would have exercised its discretion in the same way. If banks have contractual bonus schemes, then they could face claims for breach of contract if they do not honour their commitments.

Key Points



  • The government says that big bonuses encourage risk taking

  • Politicians do not understand that bonuses reflect performance

  • Most bonus schemes are designed to protect medium- and long-term business interests

  • Bonuses offer more flexibility in good and bad times

  • Government interference with our financial systems poses a greater threat than the international market adjustments now taking place.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Ronnie Fox, principal, Fox Solicitors

Additional material by Anne Hughes, solicitor, Fox Solicitors

Ronnie Fox

previous post
Friday podcast: Conservatives blast health and safety regulations; and Best Places to Work in HR 2008
next post
Case of the week: well-drafted contract is key to holiday dispute

You may also like

Public sector workers gain pay rises of up...

22 May 2025

HSBC employees warned of office attendance link to...

22 May 2025

Deloitte scales back salary rises and promotions

22 May 2025

Legislation could block bonuses at Thames Water

16 May 2025

Next to improve wage-setting transparency after shareholder pressure

16 May 2025

Ofgem workers ballot for strike action

2 May 2025

What will reward look like in 2035?

28 Apr 2025

NI increase has not caused ‘knee-jerk reaction’ in...

23 Apr 2025

Post-pandemic starters seek more pay for on-site working

10 Apr 2025

Maisie Adam to host Employee Benefits Awards 2025

3 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+