Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Q&A

by Personnel Today 2 Oct 2001
by Personnel Today 2 Oct 2001

Legal questions and answers

Q  We have a close sales team, who
work under pressure to demanding targets. There is a lot of "banter"
and jokes against individuals which has always been part of their working life
and has never been objected to by any of the team. A Welsh individual has joined
the sales team and finds this unacceptable and has raised complaints about
jokes which have been made because he is Welsh. We are considering terminating
his contract as he does not seem able to work in this environment. Are we able
to do so?

A  Practically there is
nothing to stop you dismissing him but you should be aware of certain risks if
you do. This individual has raised grievances which you are under a duty to
investigate fully. The banter he is subjected to during his working life is causing
him distress and is capable of amounting to racial harassment, on the grounds
that he is being subjected to jokes which otherwise he would not have to face
on the basis that he is Welsh.

The Welsh are a nationality within the meaning of race discrimination
legislation and can therefore be protected against harassment. As with all
cases of harassment under discrimination law it is not the motive of the people
making the comments that is the guiding factor, but their subjective effect on
the individual.

Dismissal in these circumstances without a full investigation and seeking to
remedy the behaviour complained about would leave the individual able to claim
that his dismissal was linked to his nationality and may found the basis of a
race discrimination claim against you, in addition to potential wrongful and
(in cases where the employee has one or more years’ service with the company)
unfair dismissal claims. Equally, where you have received complaints of this
nature and you fail to act, should he resign, he may then be able to claim
constructive unfair dismissal as well as wrongful dismissal and race
discrimination.

Q We have reason to believe that an employee has been accessing
pornography on the Internet during office hours. Do we have justifiable grounds
to sack him?

A  Not necessarily. You should
always carry out a proper investigation and procedure, even if you consider the
actions of the employee amount to gross misconduct warranting their instant
dismissal.

First, you need to consider what evidence you have that the employee has
been accessing pornography. Have you been told by other employees? Can you
obtain statements from them?

You may want to access his computer but you should consider first whether
you have a communications policy that lets you do this. Remember that
generally, an employer does not have an "automatic" right to access
or monitor an employee’s e-mails or Internet use without consent.

If you do not have a policy then, provided the allegations are serious, you
would probably be justified in checking which sites the employee was accessing.
You should also check whether it has been made clear to staff that they should
not access certain sites.

One important point to consider is what the employee has actually been
accessing. The adage, "One man’s porn is another man’s page three" is
true in cases such as these and, ultimately, it is a subjective decision which
the company must make.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

You should always ensure that a proper procedure is carried out, and that
the employee is given an opportunity to respond to the allegations.

Compiled by the legal team at Olswang, www.Olswang.com

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Insurance industry rewards top performers
next post
NHS league tables get backing of HR

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+