Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Redundancy

Redundancy pools: Who should an employer include in the redundancy selection process?

by Personnel Today 25 Jul 2013
by Personnel Today 25 Jul 2013

Making a fair and reasonable decision regarding who should or should not be included in a redundancy pool will improve the chances of a smooth-running restructuring programme, as well as minimising the chance of a claim for unfair dismissal.

By looking at all the roles in the organisation that are affected by the restructure, the employer should consider carefully which roles to include in the pool. For example, consider including employees who work in the same or similar roles in other parts of the business including at other sites; or employees whose work might be interchangeable with those roles at direct risk of redundancy.

It is also important for the employer to adhere to any customary or agreed arrangements, or, if there are none, ensure that there is a reasonable basis for deciding which employees to include in the pool.

Jeya Thiruchelvam, employment law editor at XpertHR, said: “What will surprise many employers creating a redundancy pool is that there are no strict rules. For the employer to demonstrate that the dismissals are fair, it needs only to show that the approach it has taken was reasonable.

“That doesn’t mean to say it can just go through the motions. It has to build a genuine rationale. But if its reasoning is sound and well documented, it will be difficult for the employee to challenge the decision.”

 

 

XpertHR Tasks

 

The XpertHR Task, Decide who should be included in a redundancy pool , provides key resources to help you make the right decision when creating your redundancy pool. It includes detailed content such as:

 

Practical guidance on deciding which employees to include in a redundancy pool

Redundancy: Policy on selection for redundancy

Begin workflow on conducting a redundancy process

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

 

Personnel Today

previous post
Judicial review of new employment tribunal fees rejected
next post
Barclays appoints Irene McDermott Brown as group HR director

You may also like

X settles severance claims of former Twitter employees

22 Aug 2025

Jaguar Land Rover to lose 500 management roles

18 Jul 2025

Postmasters could take ownership of Post Office

14 Jul 2025

Microsoft to cut 9,000 jobs globally as role...

3 Jul 2025

Top 10 HR questions June 2025: Redundancy consultation

2 Jul 2025

Bioethanol plant closure could lead to 4,000 job...

26 Jun 2025

Graduate jobs this summer ‘will be toughest since...

25 Jun 2025

Allianz to cut 650 jobs in the UK

19 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Former employees of Wilko gain £2m payout

13 Jun 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise