Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEmployment lawPay & benefitsSick pay

Refusing pay rises due to sickness absence record unlikely to be illegal

by Daniel Thomas 16 Sep 2010
by Daniel Thomas 16 Sep 2010

Any legal action against an NHS Trust’s plan to refuse annual pay rises to staff who have taken more than 18 days off sick is likely to be unsuccessful unless employment contracts contains specifics about pay, according to law firm Beachcroft.

It emerged this week that Central Manchester University Hospitals Trust was introducing the new policy, which will also apply to staff who have had four separate sickness absences, as part of measures aimed at saving £120 million by 2014.

Any decision to refuse a pay rise would be discretionary and would not be applied to people with long-term illnesses or those with disabilities, the Trust said.

Health workers’ union Unison reacted angrily, warning that it would take legal action on behalf of affected staff, claiming nothing in existing contracts says staff can be denied annual incremental rises on grounds of taking too many sick days.

But Alex Lock, partner in the employment and pensions group at law firm Beachcroft, told Personnel Today that the legality of the scheme would depend on what the staff contracts of employment say and how flexible the Trust is in applying the policy.

“If the contracts set out a mechanism for deciding upon pay rises and this scheme runs counter to that, then arguably the Trust would be breaching the contract of employment,” he said.

“This is unlikely as few contracts are so prescriptive when it comes to pay. The employer will normally have enough flexibility to consider a variety of factors when looking at pay rises.”

Lock added that the Trust’s move reflects what many employers, particularly in the private sector, are doing implicitly: taking into account various aspects of an individual’s performance in deciding on whether or not and by how much to increase their pay. “This necessarily includes their attendance,” he added.

Last year, the NHS Health and Wellbeing Review found that 10 million working days are lost each year to sickness absence in the NHS. Employees are absent owing to sickness for 10.7 days a year compared with 9.7 days in the public sector as a whole, and 6.4 days for the private sector, at a cost of £1.7 billion per year.

This story is being discussed on HR Space. Join the debate.

Avatar
Daniel Thomas

previous post
Scrap right to request time off for training, business groups urge
next post
Case of the week: VAT on employee benefits

You may also like

‘It’s International HR Day – wait, you didn’t...

20 May 2022

Policeman dubbed ‘Dolly Parton’ for working Nine to...

20 May 2022

Adapt culture to hybrid work: do not force...

20 May 2022

Women in FTSE 350 leadership: ‘A lot of...

20 May 2022

City firms pledge to improve social mobility in...

20 May 2022

Squishy, flabby, foggy HR? Andrew Bartlow talks to...

20 May 2022

Movers and shakers May 2022: John Lewis and...

20 May 2022

City workers desert offices in favour of hybrid...

20 May 2022

Working from home statistics show three-fold increase

20 May 2022

Statutory sick pay reforms would save £4bn

19 May 2022
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+