Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawLatest NewsPart-time workingPensionsReservists

Reservist wins landmark Territorial Army pensions case

by Jo Faragher 16 Aug 2024
by Jo Faragher 16 Aug 2024 Territorial Army reservists on parade
Gerry Walden / Alamy Stock Photo
Territorial Army reservists on parade
Gerry Walden / Alamy Stock Photo

A retired major has won a landmark case against the Ministry of Defence that could mean thousands of reservists will receive army pensions for the first time.

Major Charles Milroy took the MoD to the employment tribunal in Glasgow, claiming that he should have been enrolled on a military pension scheme for his service between 1982 and 2015.

He served more than 37 years in the Territorial Army, including a tour in Iraq.

In 2015, the MoD revised its Armed Forces Pension Scheme (AFPS 75) to allow TA soldiers a full pension, which previously they had been denied.

He was told when he tried to enrol for a pension that it would be “administratively burdensome and extremely expensive” to provide all reservists with pensions.

Reservists

Employing reservists 

National insurance relief for hiring veterans starts today 

The MoD claimed that reservists did not typically serve for long enough to justify a pension, or work enough days of the year. Milroy argued that his length of service and work days were worthy of a pension.

Prior to 1 April 2015, reservists would only qualify for a pension during periods of mobilisation. When Milroy was mobilised to Iraq in 2007, he asked for contributions to be paid into his employer pension scheme at Scottish Water.

After he retired from Scottish Water in 2019, he increased his service for the TA from around 46 days per year to 150. Employment Judge Frances Eccles said the MoD should have recognised that he worked more than usual for a reservist.

Milroy also raised a claim under the Part Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000.

The tribunal found that the MoD had established the value of his scheme using a divisor of 365.25 to calculate his daily rate, which meant he was treated less favourably in comparison to a full-time worker.

His lawyer argued that for this to be a valid comparison, regular soldiers would have to be working 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The MoD argued that because regulars are “on call to work” every day, the comparison was fair, but the tribunal disagreed.

Judge Eccles said that not using a smaller divisor to calculate Milroy’s pension amounted to him being treated less favourably.

The judgment concluded: “Including reservists in the scheme would inevitably increase the administrative burden and cost to the MoD. [The MoD] cannot be criticised for seeking to avoid unnecessary costs and administrative burdens on the public purse. It is a legitimate aim.

“The tribunal was not persuaded however that the administrative burden and costs of allowing reservists to join the AFPS 75 scheme was sufficiently high to justify their exclusion.”

Milroy described his claim as a “test case” that could have a knock-on effect on thousands of other reservists’ entitlement to pensions.

Prior to the tribunal, he posted on social media: “If I am successful, other TA soldiers will be able to make similar claims, and for some of them this may be life-changing.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

Military and Defence sector HR opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more HR opportunities in military and defence

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
BA’s associative discrimination appeal dismissed by EAT
next post
Salary sacrifice car schemes: A guide for employers

You may also like

Staff shortages undermine NHS backlog plans, employers claim

8 Feb 2022

National insurance relief for hiring veterans starts today

6 Apr 2021

Congratulation leave? Unusual types of leave from around...

14 Jan 2016

New rules for army reservists from October 2014...

1 Oct 2014

Four employment law changes in October 2014

22 Sep 2014

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+