Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Gig economyEmployment contractsHolidays and holiday payLeave

Sash Windows decision leaves employers wide open to holiday pay claims

by Jo Faragher 29 Nov 2017
by Jo Faragher 29 Nov 2017 Action Press/REX/Shutterstock
Action Press/REX/Shutterstock

Anyone deemed to have “worker” status must be able to carry over paid annual leave, even if they have not had the opportunity to take it, the European Court of Justice has ruled.

In the case of The Sash Window Workshop and another v King, the ECJ has agreed with the Advocate General’s opinion earlier this year that Mr King, who was on a self-employed, commission-only contract as a sales person, should have been paid annual leave.

Working time

Working time: ECJ rules on timing of weekly rest periods

Why some employers must provide extra holiday in 2018

Today’s decision is significant for employers who engage people on a self-employed or contractor basis, who may now be liable for thousands in backdated holiday pay claims.

Conley King joined The Sash Window Workshop in 1999, working on a commission-only basis, receiving no pay when he was on holiday or ill. In 2008, the company offered him an employment contract, but he elected to remain self-employed.

When he left in 2012, he brought various claims in the employment tribunal, including a claim that he had been subjected to a series of unlawful deductions from wages over 13 years.

His initial tribunal found that he was a “worker” for the purposes of UK working time legislation, and therefore entitled to annual leave with pay, or payment in lieu of leave.

When the case went to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, it found there was no evidence that King gave any notice of his intention to take holiday that was then refused. King however then took the case to the Court of Appeal, at which point it was referred to the ECJ.

In today’s judgment, the ECJ noted that “the assessment of the right of a worker, such as Mr King, to paid annual leave is not connected to a situation in which his employer was faced with periods of his absence which, as with long-term sickness absence, would have led to difficulties in the organisation of work.”

“On the contrary, the employer was able to benefit, until Mr King retired, from the fact that he did not interrupt his professional activity in its service in order to take paid annual leave.”

The ECJ added: “EU law therefore precludes a situation in which the worker has to take his leave before establishing whether he has the right to be paid in respect of that leave.”

“Unlike in a situation of accumulation of entitlement to paid annual leave by a worker who was unfit for work due to sickness, an employer that does not allow a worker to exercise his right to paid annual leave must bear the consequences.”

The judgment also made it clear that Sash Window Workshop’s ignorance on King’s employment status was no defence for not paying his holiday or sick pay: “The fact that Sash Window Workshop considered, wrongly, that Mr King was not entitled to paid annual leave is irrelevant. Indeed, it is for the employer to seek all information regarding his obligations in that regard,” it said.

Nicola Ihnatowicz, employment partner at law firm Trowers & Hamlins said: “Employers who find that those they have always regarded as self-employed contractors actually have worker status will now potentially be faced with a significant financial liability for unpaid holiday pay.”

This liability could stretch back years, she added: “Under the Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014 there is a two-year backstop on claims for holiday pay.

“However, following the decision in Sash Window Workshop the entitlement to pay in lieu arises all at once on termination so the two-year back pay limit will have no relevance.

“As a result employers who have failed to provide their workers with adequate facility to take paid leave may be looking at a liability for many years of untaken holiday.”

Clare Gilroy-Scott, partner at Goodman Derrick, which represented King, said: “This case is of importance in clarifying that workers who are denied their entitlement under the Working Time Regulations to paid annual leave do not have to take a period of unpaid leave first before taking legal action to receive pay for that leave.

“This would otherwise have left a worker (who was without protection from unfair dismissal and reliant upon continued work) with the unattractive prospect of having to suffer a detrimental impact on his remuneration by taking unpaid leave. The court has confirmed that a worker may carry over and make a claim for untaken leave entitlement on the termination of the engagement in these circumstances.”

Because the decision refers to the UK’s obligations under the EU-derived Working Time Directive, this is an example of a decision that UK courts will still have to observe prior to Brexit and during any transition period.

Connie Cliff, principal associate at Gowling WLG, said there will be more clarity on the extent of employers’ holiday pay obligations when the case returns to the Court of Appeal.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

She said: “But what precisely will be the loss of individuals such as Mr King? Where the individual took holiday which was unpaid, assessing the financial loss is easy. But where the individual continued to work (and get paid for that work) instead of taking holiday, what is the financial loss?

“Is it, as the EAT held, limited to the lost health and welfare benefits of taking annual leave and so unliquidated damages that will need to be assessed rather than lost wages? For the answer we will need to await the return of the case to the Court of Appeal.”

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
How to inspire your people in a market ruled by Brexit
next post
Sickness absence: plan now for the ageing workforce

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

How can businesses build protections for gig workers?

7 May 2025

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

2 May 2025

Top 10 HR questions April 2025: increases to...

2 May 2025

Employment Rights Bill must be tightened to protect...

1 May 2025

Increasing burnout fuelling demand for sabbaticals

30 Apr 2025

Uber drivers experience ‘false autonomy’ over work

16 Apr 2025

Home Office reveals employers’ costly right-to-work mistakes

7 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+