Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Constructive dismissalEmployment lawEmployment tribunals

Sharon Shoesmith given leave to appeal dismissal

by Laura Chamberlain 2 Sep 2010
by Laura Chamberlain 2 Sep 2010

Sharon Shoesmith is free to appeal the ruling over her sacking as the head of children’s services at Haringey council following the Baby Peter affair.

In April 2010, Mr Justice Foskett rejected Shoesmith’s claim for a judicial review of her dismissal but in a ruling published on 31 August, he gave her permission to take the case to the Court of Appeal. He also reduced the claims of costs against her from £350,000 to a total of £15,000.

Shoesmith was sacked by Ed Balls, education secretary at the time, after a damning Ofsted report highlighted leadership failings in the child protection department in Haringey.

Foskett said he stood by his original judgment but, given the wider public interest issues, Shoesmith should be given permission to appeal.

“It is by no means fanciful that the Court of Appeal may differ from my view,” said Foskett.

The judge took into account Shoesmith’s treatment by both Ed Balls and Haringey Council during her sacking while considering the claims for costs against her. He slashed claims for costs from the former education secretary from £140,000 to £25,000 due to the abrasive manner in which he had removed her. In December 2008, Balls announced her removal at a televised press conference and urged Haringey Council to sack her without compensation.

Haringey council asked the judge to award £90,000 costs against Shoesmith, but Foskett criticised them for the way they sacked Shoesmith and said that the council’s procedures did not give “the appearance of fairness”. He ordered it to pay Shoesmith £10,000.

Foskett said: “When someone perceives that he or she has been treated unfairly by those in power, so much the greater is the desire for redress and vindication… It seems to me to be wholly unreal for me to ignore that kind of factor in the overall analysis of what drove the need for this litigation.”

In the ruling, Foskett also criticised Ofsted for failing to produce thousands of pages of documents relating to the case until the 11th hour of the original judicial review hearing, causing delays, and he threw out its claim for £115,000 costs against Shoesmith.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

He said: “It is entirely open to a court to deprive a party of costs that it might otherwise be entitled to receive because of its conduct within the litigation… In my judgment, this is a paradigm case for doing so.”

Baby Peter was killed by his mother, her partner and a lodger in August 2007, despite more than 60 visits from health and social service professionals in the eight months prior to his death.

Laura Chamberlain

previous post
HR news round-up: HR stories making the headlines 2 September 2010
next post
Free Guides: Getting the most out of your Sales team

You may also like

Sighing in frustration at colleague was discriminatory, judge...

23 May 2025

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+