Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employee relationsLatest NewsEconomics, government & businessIndustrial action / strikes

Strike ballot restriction plans are ‘provocative’ and should be avoided, HR warns

by Personnel Today 7 Jul 2010
by Personnel Today 7 Jul 2010

Government plans to curb union strike powers are “provocative”, HR directors and employers groups have warned, as they urged ministers against tightening up strike ballot regulations.

Earlier this week it was revealed ministers had held secret talks about blocking nationwide strikes this autumn as departments enforce spending cuts of up to 40% and the loss of up to 600,000 public sector jobs.

The CBI has also called for amendments to strike ballot regulations, which would require at least 40% of the workforce to support the action.

But experts have spurned the recommendations. Mike Emmottt, adviser on employee relations at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, said days lost through strike action were at “historically low levels”.

He told Personnel Today: “If the government were now to change the rules on balloting it would seem just another burden on public sector employees who are already threatened by job cuts, pay freezes and, in the short to medium term, something unpleasant on pensions.

“I think it would look provocative… and it seems perverse for the government now to make balloting a tougher challenge for unions when the courts have been adding to problems of conducting successful ballots.”

Gill Hibberd, strategic director (resources and business transformation) at Buckinghamshire County Council, agreed: “There is a danger that the move will be seen as highly provocative in today’s climate. I would prefer to work with trade unions in an open and constructive way so they understand the seriousness of the current economic climate and help find solutions.

“This means though that they will also need to face the reality that jobs will be lost and terms and conditions will need to change across the public sector to reflect the market conditions.”

Stephen Overell, associate director of The Work Foundation, described it as a mistake to unpick the settlements made under Labour “merely in light of the recession”.

“We think the recession and new mood of tackling the deficit is being used as a fig leaf for old, longstanding Conservative and business concerns,” he said. “We don’t think there’s any case for it. There’s been a number of recent strikes, [but] if you look at the stats – which give a longer-term picture industrial action is extremely rare and becoming rarer over time.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Figures from the Office for National Statistics show during the recession the number of strikes dropped from 124 in the 12 months to April 2009, to 98 in the year to April 2010.

Claire Ogden, employment expert at law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, said procedural requirements relating to industrial action are already notoriously difficult to satisfy in the UK. “Trade unions are likely to regard any such change to the law on balloting for strike action as yet another hurdle to them enforcing what they are commonly quoted as saying is a ‘right to strike’,” she added.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Tribunal claims increase by 56% to the highest level ever recorded
next post
Employers must offer more financial support to staff as stress levels double

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Public sector workers gain pay rises of up...

22 May 2025

UK net migration slashed by half in one...

22 May 2025

How neuroscience can unlock employee recognition

22 May 2025

UK universities fret over fall in international students

22 May 2025

HSBC employees warned of office attendance link to...

22 May 2025

The Law Society: Navigating the new world of...

22 May 2025

Workplace stress: Why it’s time to rebrand resilience

22 May 2025

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+