Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Collective redundancyCase lawRedundancy

Supreme Court ruling in USA v Nolan on collective redundancy consultation

by Stephen Simpson 21 Oct 2015
by Stephen Simpson 21 Oct 2015 Glenn Copus / Evening Standard /REX Shutterstock
Glenn Copus / Evening Standard /REX Shutterstock

In the long-running case USA v Nolan, the UK Supreme Court has held that the US Government did have collective redundancy consultation obligations towards civilian workers during the closure of a US army base in the UK. The case now returns to the Court of Appeal to decide if redundancy consultation began in time.

Collective redundancy consultation

Redundancy: Conduct a redundancy process

Collective redundancies: line manager briefing

Informing and consulting during a collective redundancy process: good practice

USA v Nolan: background

About 200 civilian staff were employed at a US army base in Hampshire.

In March 2006, the US Government decided to close the base by the end of September.

Employees were informed of the closure in April and, in June, their representatives were told that all employees were at risk of redundancy.

Collective consultation on the proposed redundancies began in early June 2006.

Employees, including Ms Nolan, were given notices of dismissal at the end of June. Their dismissals took effect at the end of September.

Ms Nolan, an employee representative, brought a claim on behalf of the civilian staff at the base that the US Government should have started consulting earlier.

USA v Nolan: through the courts

The employment tribunal awarded the employees protective awards because the employer did not consult on redundancies “in good time”. This decision was confirmed by the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

However, the case stalled after it was appealed again and sent to the European Court of Justice. The European Court decided that, as the employer concerned is a sovereign nation, it is not bound by the European Collective Redundancies Directive.

In July 2015, the case returned to the UK for the Supreme Court to consider whether or not, despite not being bound by EU law, the US Government still had collective redundancy consultation obligations under domestic legislation.

USA v Nolan: Supreme Court decision

Collective redundancy consultation: cases on appeal

Cases on appeal Keep track of appeals in important employment cases, including on collective redundancy consultation.

In its judgment of 21 October 2015, the UK Supreme Court held that UK domestic laws on redundancy consultation do apply to employees of public administrative bodies, such as US government employees working on UK soil.

The Supreme Court said that this is the case even though the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 goes beyond what the Collective Redundancies Directive requires.

The case now returns to the Court of Appeal for it to consider whether or not the US Government complied with its redundancy consultation obligations under UK law.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The key question for the Court of Appeal is likely to be whether the duty arises when the employer has made a strategic decision from which collective redundancies will follow, or at an earlier stage, when the employer is contemplating a decision from which redundancies might follow.

Continue reading for further analysis of the judgment and the possible implications for employers on XpertHR…

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Company directors face criminal charges over redundancies
next post
Suitable alternative employment: five tips for employers in a redundancy situation

You may also like

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

Trans ex-judge to appeal Supreme Court biological sex...

29 Apr 2025

EHRC: Interim update on single-sex spaces draws criticism

28 Apr 2025

British Steel puts brakes on redundancy process

23 Apr 2025

Opposition to Supreme Court sex ruling is ‘wishful...

22 Apr 2025

Supreme Court transgender ruling: ‘common sense’ or ‘incredibly...

17 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+