Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawEquality, diversity and inclusion

The Equalities Review recommendations

by Personnel Today 3 Apr 2007
by Personnel Today 3 Apr 2007

Not many employers will have had the time, nor indeed the inclination, to wade through the Final Report of the Equalities Review.


Its 168 pages of ‘equality-speak’ is long on analysis but short on concrete proposals, and it appears to be a self-serving justification for the work of the new super quango, the Commission for Equality and Human Rights (CEHR).


Recommendations


There are 10 in all. The first is an attempt to redefine what is meant by an equal society: “An equal society protects and promotes equal and real freedom and substantive opportunity to live in ways that people value and would choose so that everyone can flourish. An equal society recognises people’s different needs, situations and goals and removes barriers that limit what people can do and can be”.


One is tempted to add ‘and they all lived happily ever after’. How long before this catchy definition finds its way into legislation?


Employers are likely to welcome some recommendations, notably the simplification of legislation and the development of a single Equalities Act covering all discrimination, which will hopefully provide some relief to anyone who has ever had to grapple with the range of Acts and regulations that currently cover this area.


Most of the other proposals will do little other than add another layer of bureau-cracy to running a business and increase costs.


For example, it proposes a standard reporting procedure, whereby employers are either required (in the public sector) or ‘encouraged’ (in the private sector) to fill in a form designed by the CEHR to provide data on their equality performance. It’s a safe bet that despite the report’s warm words, the form will be neither simple nor short.


Discrimination


As the report also suggests, the procurement and commission of goods and services by a whole range of public and quasi-public bodies provides an opportunity to promote equality by requiring that suppliers collect data more rigorously, and by requiring suppliers to adhere to ‘sound’ equalities principles. It is a certainty that this will be used as some sort of performance measure for suppliers of goods and services to the public sector.


There are going to be some hard choices ahead for public sector bodies – do they award the large public sector contract to company ‘A’, which is 20% cheaper, or opt for company ‘B’, which has better equalities credentials because its workforce is more diverse (or because it has successfully avoided being sued?). Best-value rules are going to have to give way to something far more nebulous.


It’s plain that some form of positive discrimination is back on the agenda. Of course, it’s not called that – it’s called ‘positive action’.


In the jargon of the report, the proposals are termed “time-limited proportionate balancing measures”. While it is said not to amount to positive discrimination or affirmative action, it’s difficult to see how anything – however temporary or well intentioned – that promotes one group over another can be anything other than positive discrimination.


This report does little to dispel the concerns expressed in some quarters that there is now an equalities ‘industry’ whose existence depends on introducing ever more creative and complicated solutions to problems of disadvantage. While no-one can seriously dispute that the various discrimination legislation has helped to change the workplace culture for the better, there must come a time for a realistic appraisal of whether further bureaucratic interference is justified, given the additional burdens it places on employers.


What the equalities review report covers




  • A single Equality Act covering sexual orientation, gender, ethnicity, disability, religion and belief, transgender and age.


  • Obligations on employers to provide ‘equalities’ data.


  • Public sector contracts awarded on the basis of equalities ‘audits’.


  • Positive ‘action’ to redress long-standing areas of inequality.


  • Naming and shaming organisations whose equality performance is the subject of wilful neglect.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By Jeffrey Jupp, barrister, Seven Bedford Row





Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Teacher at centre of veil row loses dismissal appeal against former employer Kirklees Council
next post
Hamburg’s Vocational School for Gastronomy and Nutrition launches doner kebab production course

You may also like

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+