Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

The harsh reality of proposed temps law

by Personnel Today 15 Oct 2002
by Personnel Today 15 Oct 2002

With 71 per cent of employers saying they would be damaged by the EU draft
Agency Workers Directive, Ben Willmott analyses our exclusive research

This month the European Parliament will vote on the Agency Workers
Directive, which seeks to provide temporary staff with the same pay and
conditions as permanent staff.

Personnel Today and Manpower’s recent survey of almost 1,000 employers
revealed that the majority are opposed to the directive.

Under the directive as drafted, agency workers would receive equal rights as
permanent staff after they have been employed for six weeks.

The research shows that more than 70 per cent of organisations think it will
damage their businesses through increased red tape and employment costs.

Pay

The study finds that agency staff in the UK are already well rewarded for
their efforts, with 45 per cent of firms revealing they pay their agency staff
the same as permanent staff and 23 per cent paying temps more than their
permanent employees.

Ruth Hounslow, director of public affairs for Manpower, said the survey
shows that temporary staff are not treated as second class employees.

"The fact that 68 per cent of employers are already paying their agency
staff as well as or better than permanent staff shows how highly they value their
flexible workforce," she said.

Only just over a quarter of respondents pay their agency staff less than the
rest of their workers.

Benefits

However, the research reveals that agency staff are not so well rewarded in
terms of the benefits.

Half of the employers surveyed do not provide their temps with holiday pay,
while only 20 per cent of respondents provide agency staff with maternity
leave, 12 per cent paternity leave and 10 per cent pension provision.

Hounslow said Manpower offers its temps generous benefits such as maternity
pay and life insurance, but admits that many agencies need to do more in this
area.

Length of assignment

The study finds that more than half of employers typically use temps for
longer than six weeks at a time and so would be hit by the draft agency workers
directive. As many as one million temps are available for work each day in the
UK, according to REC figures.

A quarter of organisations use agency staff for periods of between six weeks
and three months, 14 per cent of firms use them for periods of between three
months and six months and 8 per cent use agency employees for between six and
12 months.

A total of 3 per cent of respondents use temps for periods of between 12
months and 18 months and 2 per cent employ them for more than 18 months.

The research shows that 40 per cent of employers use agency employees for
six weeks or less; just over a quarter employ agency workers for between two
and six weeks and 15 per cent hire them for periods of up to two weeks.

According to the study the majority of employers think the draft directive’s
qualifying period should be extended beyond six weeks.

In all, 35 per cent report they would like to see the qualifying period
lengthened to three months, 22 per cent to six months and 18 per cent to a
year.

Only 12 per cent of respondents think the qualifying period should remain at
six weeks and 9 per cent would like to see temps be given equal rights from day
one.

Reasons for using temporary staff

The survey finds that temps are used by firms to fulfil a wide range of
essential business needs and make up a considerable chunk of the UK’s
workforce.

Seven out of 10 organisations use agency staff to quickly make-up an
unpredicted shortfall in staff numbers and 56 per cent of respondents use temps
to staff short-term projects.

A large proportion of organisations use temporary staff to flex their
workforce as workloads fluctuate, with 46 of respondents highlighting this as a
reason.

In all, 12 per cent of organisations use agency staff to avoid the
administration of direct hiring and a similar proportion use temps for their
specialist skills.

Hounslow believes one of the reasons the UK employment climate is still so
healthy is because of the flexibility agency staff provide employers. "One
of the reasons we have not seen the widespread redundancies in the UK that we
might have done in the past is because of the increasing strength of the
flexible jobs market," she said.

Size of the agency worker market

Nearly half of the businesses surveyed report that temporary staff make up
between 1 and 2 per cent of their workforce.

A fifth of respondents reveal that temps represent between 3 and 5 per cent
of their employees.

In all, 9 per cent of employers report that agency staff make up 6 to 10 per
cent of their staff, while 7 per cent of respondents reveal temps represent
between 6 and 20 per cent of their workforce.

The future

Although the survey reveals the depth of concerns among UK employers about
the directive, it also indicates that most are not opposed to improving the
employment rights of agency staff on principle.

This was reinforced by a recent Personneltoday.com survey, which asked ‘do
temporary workers in the UK need more employment protection?’

In all 46 per cent of the 253 respondents voted ‘yes’.

But the six week qualification is the sticking point and must be extended to
one year’s continuous employment. The directive must be approved by the Council
of Ministers and go through a final vote at the European Parliament before it
is adopted this time next year at the earliest.

It will not become law in the UK for at least 18 months after that, but its
impact will be so significant that Personnel Today is determined to raise the
profile of the directive and ensure employers are aware of its implications.

www.manpower.co.uk

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Which benefits do you offer your temporary staff?

None                            50%
Holidays                       46%
Maternity leave             20%
Paternity leave              12%
Pension                        10%
Life assurance               3%
Health insurance           3%
Company car                2%
n/s                                2%
Stock options               0%

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Record number of young workers join T&G
next post
Civil servant to press sex claim over dress code

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+