Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Vexatious claimsEmployment tribunals

Tribunal fees judicial review to be heard this month

by Rob Moss 7 Oct 2014
by Rob Moss 7 Oct 2014 Unison general secretary Dave Prentis speaking at the Labour party conference last month. Photo: REX
Unison general secretary Dave Prentis speaking at the Labour party conference last month. Photo: REX

The new judicial review of the lawfulness of the Government’s introduction of employment tribunal fees will be heard later this month at the High Court.

The Lord Chancellor gave Unison the go-ahead last month to launch fresh proceedings in the light of consistent statistics from the Ministry of Justice that the number of employment tribunal claims has fallen dramatically since the introduction of upfront fees for claimants.

Employment tribunal resources

Employment tribunals: XpertHR Benchmarking data

Check the rules on fees to bring a tribunal claim

Form for making a claim to an employment tribunal

Tribunal procedures and penalties: the claim form – form ET1

Prior to the introduction of fees in July 2013, the employment tribunals received, on average, 48,000 new claims per quarter. Figures for April to June 2014 show that there were only 8,540 new claims in this quarter, 81% fewer than the number of claims lodged in the same period in 2013.

The judicial review will be heard on 21-22 October 2014. Unison general secretary Dave Prentis said: “The High Court’s decision to schedule the judicial review within a month of the union filing its claim shows just how important the issue of tribunal fees is.

“Over the past year we have seen tens of thousands of workers denied access to justice simply because they can no longer afford to bring an employment tribunal claim. If the Government doesn’t abolish these unfair fees it is effectively rolling out the welcome mat to unscrupulous employers, and we must do everything possible not to let that happen.”

Sarah Hogg, associate solicitor at Fasken Martineau, said: “If Unison is successful in its challenge, the Government will have to take steps to adjust the fee regime. However, it is unlikely that the current Government will abolish the fee regime altogether. A more likely outcome would be a reduction to the level of fees, as a compromise between ensuring access to justice and deterring vexatious or speculative claims made in the hope of a settlement. On a more practical level, the Government has undertaken to refund any tribunal fees paid to date in the event that Unison is successful.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

But Max Winthrop, partner at Short Richardson & Forth, said the implications are not straightforward: “What about those cases where the tribunal has ordered respondents to pay the fees? What about cases where claimants have converted tribunal awards to County Court judgments for enforcement purposes?”

He also questioned the position of claimants who have already had claims struck out because they could not pay the hearing fee.

Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. Rob specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and energy markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
Serial litigant who brought 30 employment cases in four years banned from tribunal claims
next post
Apprentices bring energy into our business – HSS Hire

2 comments

Stan Byrne HRBP 10 Oct 2014 - 7:02 am

I do hope the review has more data to consider than claims lodged. For example will TU’s be asked to provide at least the number of members who have pursued a claim with them but not been supported by the TU? Additionally, what proportion of claimants were represented by TU’s prior to and after the introduction of fees? Most good TU’s have policies to support members with good cases. This data could be very revealing. I would like to see UNISON take the lead on providing this data. I would also like to see how many claims have been successful since fees were introduced compared to before fee introduction. Tribunals represent a significant expense to taxpayers and to employers, in time and money when having to defend claims. We all wish to see a system that is fair for all, not a free for all.

Jane Bullen, HRBP 10 Oct 2014 - 9:29 pm

I wholeheartedly support the right of individuals to seek justice. However, the number of malicious cases brought before fees were introduced cannot be discounted when taking a decision to remove them. From personal experience, before the introduction of fees it was very easy for any claim to be made and listed with no evidence. ETs represent huge costs to employers and the taxpayer as Stan Byrne says, and are an especially difficult burden for charities. When an employer is doing all they can to be a fair employer and deal with poor performance or behaviours, they should be able to do so without having to then bear the costs of a spurious ET because the employee did not like the outcome, but was able to file a claim based on a 9-word claim: “I was dismissed because I have a protected characteristic”.

Comments are closed.

You may also like

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

NHS worker awarded £29k after Darth Vader comparison

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

Lincolnshire doctor awarded £250k in race discrimination case

2 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+