Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

AcasTribunal WatchEarly conciliationEmployment tribunals

Tribunal watch: Employment tribunals get tough on early conciliation requirement

by Stephen Simpson 26 May 2015
by Stephen Simpson 26 May 2015 One claim was rejected due to an incorrect early conciliation number.
One claim was rejected due to an incorrect early conciliation number.

Two recent employment tribunal decisions, upheld by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), suggest that tribunals will take a dim view of claimants who do not follow the Acas early conciliation procedure to the letter. Stephen Simpson rounds up employment tribunal decisions reported in the past week.

Early conciliation certificate required even when conciliation is impossible
In Cranwell v Cullen, the EAT held that a tribunal was right to reject a claim where the claimant had not contacted Acas under the early conciliation procedure.

Early conciliation: XpertHR resources

Policy on initial steps to take when Acas makes contact about early conciliation

How to get the most out of early conciliation

Webinar: Early conciliation and tribunal fees

Shortly after early conciliation became compulsory, the claimant sought to bring an employment tribunal claim for sexual harassment against her former employer. Her allegations were very serious, including a claim that she had been physically assaulted.

She did not comply with the requirement to follow the early conciliation procedure, on the basis that she simply could not conciliate with her former employer.

The EAT upheld the employment tribunal decision, stressing that the requirement for claimants to follow the early conciliation procedure is strict, even in cases where conciliation would be impossible.

Incorrect Acas early conciliation number on ET1 leads to claim rejection
In Sterling v United Learning Trust, the EAT refused to allow a claim to proceed where it was submitted shortly before the time limit ran out, but rejected because of an incorrect early conciliation number being entered on the ET1.

Early conciliation: the procedure

From 6 May 2015, before submitting a relevant claim to the employment tribunal, a prospective claimant must contact Acas so that claims can be settled where possible, without the need to go to an employment tribunal. The procedure requires an early conciliation certificate to submit a tribunal claim.

The claimant brought various employment tribunal claims. She submitted her ET1 form a few days before the time limit ran out.

The employment tribunal rejected the ET1 form because it contained an incorrect early conciliation number. By the time she received the form back from the tribunal to resubmit it, her claims were out of time.

The EAT agreed with the employment tribunal’s decision, stressing that it was the claimant’s responsibility to check that the information was correct before the claim was presented.

However, the EAT suggested that a claimant in this situation could make an application for reconsideration to the tribunal.

Other tribunal decisions in the headlines

Gay police officer friend of Michael Barrymore wins discrimination case
An employment tribunal has ruled that a gay police officer who was friends with Michael Barrymore was subjected to discrimination, harassment and victimisation while working for the Metropolitan Police, according to the Evening Standard.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Ongoing caste discrimination case hit with costs claim
A former practice manager who accused a firm of solicitors for discriminating because he married a woman of a higher Asian caste than himself has made a costs claim of £120,000 against his former employers, even though the case was abandoned, says Solicitors Journal.

Care worker wins £8,000 from text pest boss
A care worker who received a string of sexually explicit text messages from her boss has won her case for sexual harassment and discrimination, reports the Scottish Herald.

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Pensions auto-enrolment: could an audit service prevent costly mistakes?
next post
Zero hours contracts: exclusivity clauses now unenforceable

You may also like

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

NHS worker awarded £29k after Darth Vader comparison

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

Lincolnshire doctor awarded £250k in race discrimination case

2 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+