Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

TUPE

TUPE: Can transferring employees bring consultation claims against the transferee?

by Guy Lamb 23 Jul 2014
by Guy Lamb 23 Jul 2014

In DLA Piper’s latest case report, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that employment tribunals have no jurisdiction to entertain freestanding claims by transferred employees against the transferee for its failure to provide the transferor with information about the measures that it envisages it will take in relation to the transferring employees.

XpertHR resources

Letter to employee representatives starting consultation on measures in relation to affected employees

Good practice manual: TUPE

Handling TUPE transfers: Line manager briefing

Allen and others v Morrison Facilities Services Ltd EAT/0298/13

Facts

The claimants were employed by a facilities management company performing a housing maintenance contract for Leeds City Council. Following a retendering exercise, new contracts were awarded to a number of new providers, including the respondent, Morrison Facilities Services (MFS). The claimants were employed in the part of the services that were taken on by MFS. This resulted in a TUPE transfer to MFS under the “service provision change” provisions of TUPE.

Employment tribunal claims

The employees who had transferred brought a number of claims against both their old employer and MFS alleging various failures in the consultation process in the run-up to the transfer. Under TUPE, the transferring employer is required to inform and, if appropriate, consult with either elected employee representatives or representatives of a recognised trade union. Regulation 13(2)(d) of TUPE obliges an employer to inform representatives of the measures in connection with the transfer that it envisages the transferee will take. Regulation 13(4) of TUPE obliges the prospective new employer to provide the old employer with relevant information in advance of the transfer to enable the transferring employer to perform the duty imposed by reg.13(2).

In addition to the various claims brought against their original employer, the claimants also brought a claim against MFS that it had failed to comply with its duty under reg.13(4) of TUPE. However, the claims against the claimants’ original employer were subsequently withdrawn or settled, leaving only the claims against MFS under reg.13(4).

At first instance, the employment tribunal rejected the claims and the employees appealed to the EAT.

EAT decision

The question arising was whether or not a claim can be brought against a transferee by transferred employees for the transferee’s failure to comply with its obligation under reg.13(4) to provide information to the transferor to enable it to comply with its obligations under reg.13(2)(d).

The EAT considered that reg.13(4) does not impose an obligation on employers to provide information to employees. The entitlement to be provided with the information belongs to the transferor, not the transferring employees. The EAT also considered the purpose of the Acquired Rights Directive (which TUPE implements) and noted that the Directive does not require the introduction of the right of redress for the benefit of transferred employees against a transferee. The EAT therefore concluded that to hold that an employee can pursue a claim against a transferee for breach of its obligations under reg.13(4) would not achieve the Directive’s purpose.

The EAT also considered that it is the employee’s status at the date of the non-compliance that dictates the entitlement to bring a claim. At the time of the alleged non-compliance with reg.13(4), MFS was not the employer. The mechanism in reg.15(1)(d) does not permit transferred employees to bring a claim directly against the transferee, MFS. In addition, transferred employees do not obtain standing to claim against a transferee on the ground that they later become employees of the transferee, pursuant to the transfer.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Regulation 15(5) provides that the only route for transferred employees to obtain compensation from a transferee is to bring a claim against the transferor and for the transferee to subsequently be made party to the proceedings on the basis that it failed to provide the transferor with the requisite information under reg.13(4). The EAT noted that this was not available to the transferred employees in the circumstances, given that the claims against the transferor had already been settled or withdrawn.

The EAT dismissed the employees’ appeal, holding that it had no jurisdiction to entertain a freestanding claim by transferred employees against the transferee for its failure to comply with its obligations under reg.13(4).

Guy Lamb

Guy Lamb is a partner at DLA Piper.

previous post
RAD Awards open for entries, celebrating 25 years in recruitment communications
next post
Funding pressures force wage growth to remain subdued

You may also like

Top 10 HR questions January 2025: TUPE employee...

4 Feb 2025

BMA staff ready to strike over pay

30 Jan 2025

Top 10 HR questions October 2024: National living...

1 Nov 2024

Top 10 HR questions August 2024: Duty to...

4 Sep 2024

Top 10 HR questions July 2024: Unfair dismissal...

2 Aug 2024

More than 1,500 jobs to go at Carpetright

22 Jul 2024

NatWest set to buy part of Sainsbury’s Bank

20 Jun 2024

Labour publishes plan to deliver New Deal for...

28 May 2024

Further changes to TUPE regulations proposed

20 May 2024

An HR things-to-do list for April 2024

5 Apr 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+