Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEconomics, government & businessJob creation and losses

UK employers face tougher rules on redundancies after landmark decision by the Employment Appeal Tribunal

by Mike Berry 29 Oct 2007
by Mike Berry 29 Oct 2007

Making staff redundant just became much tougher after a landmark ruling moved the UK closer to continental-style employment laws.

A decision by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) last week significantly changed employers’ obligations when consulting with staff representatives over collective redundancies.

Legal experts warned that employers will now be forced to involve unions and staff in the decision-making process when they plan to close businesses and make multiple redundancies.

Unlike in Europe, UK employers have not previously needed to consult with unions about the reason for closing a workplace. Employers have instead concentrated on discussing ways to reduce the impact of a closure.

The judgment also means unions could demand access to critical business information to challenge the rationale for closures. Firms could be liable for millions of pounds in compensation if they fail to follow proper procedures.

David Bradley, head of employment at law firm DLA Piper, said financial services firms struggling to maintain staff levels on the back of the credit crunch would be hit particularly hard by the ruling.

“City employers with redundancies on their HR agenda are going to have to think carefully about how they ensure any sensitive information they now have to disclose remains within the confines of their organisation,” he warned.

Lucy Atherton, senior legal adviser at manufacturers’ body the EEF, said employers needed to ensure prompt talks with unions over redundancies as the process could take longer than before.

However Ed Sweeney, the new chairman of conciliation service Acas, said employers should not be fearful about consulting on the reasons behind closures. “Any employer worth their salt should be able to say ‘I’m doing this, and this is the justification’,” he told Personnel Today.

The case

The landmark EAT case involved mining company UK Coal and the National Union of Mineworkers. It concerned the 2005 closure of the Ellington Colliery in Northumberland, with the loss of 330 jobs.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The union took the company to court because it failed to carry out the required 90-day consultation period before closing the pit on safety grounds.

The court ruled that the failure to consult on the reason behind the decision was unlawful. UK Coal will have to pay out more than £2m in damages to the Ellington workers.

Mike Berry

previous post
Workplace health set to rise up GP agenda
next post
Remploy human resources chief Anne Jessopp defends modernisation plan rejected by trade union consortium

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Public sector workers gain pay rises of up...

22 May 2025

UK net migration slashed by half in one...

22 May 2025

How neuroscience can unlock employee recognition

22 May 2025

UK universities fret over fall in international students

22 May 2025

HSBC employees warned of office attendance link to...

22 May 2025

The Law Society: Navigating the new world of...

22 May 2025

Workplace stress: Why it’s time to rebrand resilience

22 May 2025

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+