Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawLegal sectorLatest NewsTech sectorRedundancy

UK Twitter workers allege redundancy was a ‘sham’

by Rob Moss 12 Jan 2023
by Rob Moss 12 Jan 2023 Image: Shutterstock
Image: Shutterstock

Former Twitter workers in the UK have sought legal advice over their recent redundancies, which they have described as a ‘sham’.

The Guardian newspaper has reported that the 43 workers feel they were subject to “unlawful, unfair and completely unacceptable” treatment as they were made redundant.

A flawed consultation period was at the centre of the complaints made to law firm Winckworth Sherwood, which has raised the prospect of cases going to the employment tribunal.

Redundancy

Amazon plans to shut three UK warehouses: 1,200 jobs at risk

Amazon redundancies: is big tech facing a big shrink?

Planned redundancies increase by 15%

Redundancy: Five common errors businesses must avoid

A letter, seen by the Guardian, sent to Twitter managers stated: “We consider that an employment tribunal will take an extremely dim view of the company’s failings to date, not least having regard to its size, resources and access to legal advice.”

The former employees were treated as if they had already been dismissed when hearing of their redundancy on 18 November 2022, the law firm stated, with the legal obligation to consult for 45 days being ignored.

The letter alleges that staff were immediately cut off from internal Twitter systems, which effectively suspended them from their jobs when Twitter had no contractual right to do so. This also had the effect of making it impossible for employee representatives to assist their colleagues effectively.

The law firm said it believed an employment tribunal judge would reach the same conclusion, particularly as there had been, the workers allege, a failure to establish fair selection criteria for redundancy. There was also doubt it said, whether the redundancies were genuine given the fact Twitter was still flagging up job opportunities in London on its corporate website.

The letter referred to the stress, anxiety and distress caused to those affected by the redundancy decision.

On taking over Twitter, Elon Musk, also the new chief executive of firm, has made about 3,700 people, half of its employees, redundant.

This led in the US to four class action lawsuits and 200 legal complaints, from affected workers.

HR specialist Sue Allen wrote in December in a blog that Twitter’s actions in the UK, as they stood, could be challenged. She wrote: “While most of Twitter’s employees are based in California, there are UK employees based in Birmingham, London and Manchester. As it stands, Twitter has failed to comply with its duty to collectively consult with its employees in the UK. This move is considered to be procedurally unfair, which could give rise to claims of unfair dismissal from its UK employees.”

Allen added that Twitter still needed to demonstrate why the sudden dismissals were necessary. “While Musk’s financial reasons may be considered ‘reasonable’, the vagueness of the reasons behind choosing not to consult with employees in advance may still land Musk in hot water with regards to unfair dismissal claims.”

Philip Paget, employment law partner at law firm Gordons, said: “The importance of proper consultation and fair selection criteria in making redundancy exercises fair is so often misunderstood or in some cases, perhaps deliberately ignored. This unfortunately has been illustrated all too often by non-UK headquartered employers.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“One could be forgiven for thinking that those with deep enough pockets think the rules don’t really apply to them. Well, a word to the wise: the rules most certainly do apply to you. It will be interesting to see how Elon Musk responds to these claims.”

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. Rob specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and energy markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
RAD Awards 2023 shortlist: In-house Employer Brand Team of the Year
next post
Strikes Bill: when the unthinkable becomes policy

You may also like

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

British Steel puts brakes on redundancy process

23 Apr 2025

British Steel: MPs recalled to enable nationalisation

11 Apr 2025

Met Police cuts 1,700 officers and staff in...

3 Apr 2025

Top 10 HR questions March 2025: Carrying over...

2 Apr 2025

Sky to close call centres cutting 2,000 jobs

28 Mar 2025

Reasons behind Dundee University job losses to be...

28 Mar 2025

British Steel to shed 2,700 jobs at Scunthorpe...

27 Mar 2025

April 2025: What’s coming up for HR?

21 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+