Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

UK workers in favour of keeping 48-hour opt-out

by Personnel Today 6 Apr 2004
by Personnel Today 6 Apr 2004

British workers oppose moves to end the UK’s opt-out to the working time
directive, according to a new study.

A clear majority of those who work more than 48 hours a week do so largely
as a result of their own choice rather than employer compulsion, research by
the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) claims.

The survey of more than 750 long-hours workers, Calling Time on Working
Time?, also claims there is little evidence of any employer abuse of the
opt-out.

Around three-quarters of staff who sign the clause do so as a result of
their own choice rather than any employer pressure, and only a minority
actually sign the clause at the same time as signing their employment contracts
– a key concern identified in the European Commission’s consultation, which
closed last week.

Gerwyn Davies, the report’s author, said: "Our survey shows that
long-hours workers are opposed to the removal of the opt-out and in particular
any moves to restrict their freedom to choose to work long hours.

"The issue of long hours working is complex. It cannot be addressed by
a uniform ban.

"The negative effects of long-hours working are evident from the
report, but these are best solved by employer measures, such as flexible
working arrangements, rather than a blanket ban on long hours working."

The survey clearly illustrates the potentially damaging effects of long
hours on employee welfare and productivity. Around 10 per cent of employees
report physical effects and 17 per cent an impact on mental health.

More than a third of staff report that working long hours negatively affects
their performance, with a significant proportion believing they could be just
as effective and productive if they cut their working hours.

Key findings of the long-hours survey

– Seven out of 10 respondents stated that it was partly or
totally their choice  to work in excess
of 48 hours. However, 30 per cent claimed that there was an element of
compulsion, which was up from 11 per cent in 1998

– The majority of respondents working 48 or more hours a week
were putting in the extra hours consistently throughout the year. Almost
three-quarters (73 per cent) of those working 48 or more hours a week did so
either most weeks or every week

– Six out of 10 respondents who had signed the opt-out clause
did so after the date of signing the employment contract, with some 37 per cent
signing on the date itself

– The biggest regret among respondents working 48 hours or more
a week was the fact that they missed out on leisure and hobby time. This was
put forward by  almost seven out of
10  (69 per cent) people. Strain on
partner relationships was also a key concern (47 per cent)

– Almost half (45 per cent) of respondents believed their
companies encouraged the working of long hours

– More than four out of 10 respondents (41 per cent) claimed
they could maintain the same level of productivity while cutting back the
number of hours worked each week

– When explicitly asked whether the EU should have the right to
limit the number of hours staff work, a clear majority (66 per cent) were
against the notion

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

– Fewer than one in three workers can identify the number of
hours set out by the Working Time Directive

Source: CIPD

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Majority of flexible working requests are granted
next post
Lords ease pressure over stress at work

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+