Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Employment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionRetirement

Weekly dilemma: Renegotiating contracts for 65-year-olds

by Gagandeep Prasad 26 Aug 2008
by Gagandeep Prasad 26 Aug 2008

A valued employee will be 65 this October. We’d like to keep him on, but also see this as an opportunity to renegotiate his contract. What are we allowed to do as regards salary and terms and conditions etc.?


On the assumption that he has indicated he wants to stay on rather than retire on reaching 65, you should be aware that the duty to consider procedure is not intended to give employers an opportunity to renegotiate an employee’s contract. The only way to do this is if the employee agrees to it.


The legislation does not make any provision for changing terms and conditions. In fact, if an employee makes a request to work beyond their retirement age, they are entitled to do so on the same terms and conditions and the same benefits as they were receiving before.


That said, there is nothing to prevent you from asking him if he would be willing to consider a changed role, but you should be careful in any discussions as you do not want to give him grounds for bringing a claim of age discrimination. You mention that he is a valued member of staff, and therefore presumably you do not want to lose him. The question of whether or not he is likely to agree will depend on what you are going to offer him and whether, for example, there is a change of role which would suit him. However, if you are seeking to reduce his salary and terms and conditions in general for the same job, he is very unlikely to agree, and you cannot impose any new terms and conditions on him, as this will give him grounds for claiming age discrimination and/or constructive unfair dismissal.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

If he is not likely to be willing to agree to a change in salary and terms and conditions, and you do not therefore want him to stay on after he is 65, it will be important to ensure that you go through the statutory duty to consider procedure before retiring him, so that you are not at risk of claims of age discrimination or unfair dismissal. It is not clear whether this has already started, but if it has not, you should give him at least six months’ notice of his intended retirement date, otherwise you will be in breach of the procedure, and liable for compensation of up to eight weeks’ pay.


Gagandeep Prasad, solicitor, Charles Russell’s Employment Group

Gagandeep Prasad

previous post
Increased IT outsourcing has widened technology skills gap
next post
Equal pay: are we any further forward?

You may also like

Judge in Supreme Court ruling said he’d ‘take...

15 Sep 2025

Employment lawyers voice AI fears on tribunal claims

15 Sep 2025

Day one rights to make 86% more cautious...

14 Sep 2025

How to steer EDI through a ‘permacrisis’

12 Sep 2025

Employment Rights Bill U-turn unlikely, say legal experts

10 Sep 2025

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

10 Sep 2025

Women less confident of achieving pay or leadership...

9 Sep 2025

Bigger budgets, but greater scrutiny – welcome to...

9 Sep 2025

Reshuffle sparks fears over Employment Rights Bill

8 Sep 2025

EHRC submits new code of practice to government

5 Sep 2025

  • Workplace health benefits need to be simplified SPONSORED | Long-term sickness...Read more
  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise