Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employee relationsEmployment lawData protectionEconomics, government & businessDepartment for Work and Pensions

What could ID cards mean for HR?

by Ross Wigham 5 Jul 2005
by Ross Wigham 5 Jul 2005

What could ID cards mean for HR?


Compulsory ID cards are the latest political ‘big idea’ to split the nation’s policy makers. But as MP acrimoniously hammer out the details, opinion among the business community is equally polarised.


The Identity Cards Bill was announced in the Queens Speech back in May, but the government’s majority on the issue has slipped amid concerns about privacy, reliability, security and, crucially, costs.


The scheme is also losing public support, with the latest YouGov figures showing that just 45% of people support ID cards, compared to more than 75% in 2003.


Although the introduction of ID cards will undoubtedly simplify some employer duties to do with background checks or an individual’s right to work in the UK, the current uncertainty does little to help firms prepare.


The issue has been further clouded for employers by the assertion that the cards may be introduced on a voluntary basis before becoming compulsory.


Ben Willmott, employee relations adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) said the political machinations make it hard for HR to envisage the impact of ID cards.


“It’s very political at the moment and it’s not clear how the system will work or even how it will be funded,” he said. ‘However, it looks as if it could simplify the process of checking if a candidate is allowed to work in the UK.”


In broader terms the CBI welcomed the latest version of the Bill, highlighting a number of key benefits for businesses including better sharing of information between the public and private sectors and a much needed tool to combat fraud.


CBI deputy director general, John Cridland, said recent developments had gone some way to ease business concerns, but that crucial questioned remained unanswered.


“ID cards could be a positive step towards tackling identity theft which is an increasing threat to companies and consumers. They could also make a significant contribution to improving the efficiency of public services by making it easier to exchange data,” he explained.


“Firms are concerned about information being shared without adequate safeguards. We want more information and serious questions remain unanswered,” he added.


At the other end of the spectrum trade unions are worried that ID cards could lead to discrimination against ethnic minority workers or those suffering from certain illnesses.


A TUC spokesperson said there were also fundamental concerns over privacy and the cost of the scheme to individuals: “We are concerned about the damaging impact the proposals may have on already vulnerable groups in our society. There are fears that some employers will only hire black and ethnic minority people if they can show an ID card, even before they become compulsory for everyone.”


There are also legal concerns over the information that could be stored on the proposed biometric cards.


Robert Bond, a partner at law firm Faegre and Benson, said the way employers access or use information from ID cards could lead to problems.


“We’ve seen a recent case in France where a company was taken to court because they were using an ID card scheme to monitor staff. The [UK] Bill could also place an unnecessary administrative burden on employers, because they may be responsible for updating certain pieces of information,” he said.


Bond also warned that the way employers used information from the cards could lead to data protection problems. Although workers would be protected against out of date or inaccurate data by the Information Commissioner, it is unclear who would judge what information was relevant when recruiting staff.


“The whole of the ID card Bill will be substantially challenged by the data protection laws. One of the worries is there is nothing specific in there about information that is of no relevance to employment.


“However, if the rights of the individual are protected as well as they should be, this could be a useful tool for HR. It could be used for some references and replace existing pre-employment checks, although that’s still a long way off.”


weblink www.homeoffice.gov.uk/comrace/identitycards


 


 


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 


 


 

Ross Wigham

previous post
EOC renews call for equal pay audits
next post
HR staff at risk as Asda cuts 1,000 jobs

You may also like

Number of Neet women rises but figures fall...

23 May 2025

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

23 May 2025

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

UK net migration slashed by half in one...

22 May 2025

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Pay awards in real terms could fall for...

21 May 2025

UK and EU agree to collaborate on ‘youth...

19 May 2025

Immigration white paper: which jobs will be affected?

19 May 2025

Public sector needs 92,000 more workers to remain...

19 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+