Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawWorking Time Regulations

Work time rules drive wedge between unions and bosses

by Personnel Today 23 Nov 2004
by Personnel Today 23 Nov 2004

The British Government’s interpretation of the European Road Transport (Working Time) Directive could face ‘legal scrutiny’ from the Transport & General Workers Union (T&G), which claims it will leave many drivers working more hours than they do under existing laws.

Under the directive, mobile workers will be restricted to an average of 48 hours a week, but there are allowances for a maximum 60 hours in any single week.

The union’s national secretary for transport Ron Webb said: “The Government and industry have missed a golden opportunity to modernise the industry. These draft regulations – especially those on flexibility and periods of availability – go to the heart of the directive and undermine it. Quite frankly, the Government has injected real confusion.

“It would be surprising if the employers welcomed these plans, but the T&G certainly believes there is no real benefit to drivers.”

The union is believed to be considering asking the European Court to overrule elements of the UK’s implementation.

The draft regulations were issued by the Department for Transport for consultation at the beginning of the month, comments are requested by 12 December, with the directive due to come in to force on 23 March, 2005.

The union said the draft regulations lacked clarity over the definition of waiting time for drivers – known as periods of availability – when vehicles are being loaded or unloaded.

The union believes this time should be included in the working week because some drivers, especially those in retail distribution, will clock up 65-hour weeks. The union said it will cause confusion in sectors such as petroleum distribution where waiting times are shorter.

And its views have been echoed by the United Road Transport Union. General secretary Bob Monks said: “I am genuinely concerned at the Government’s apparent lack of any kind of understanding of the environment that drivers work in. It has failed to take notice of drivers’ views and has failed completely in its duty to protect drivers under health and safety legislation.”

Monks said the union had hoped the directive would make the industry more attractive to new drivers, through reduced hours, and would help to ease the shortage of 45,000 drivers, but it now looks as though its introduction will lead to even more driver vacancies.

However, the union’s criticisms have come under fire from trade body the Freight Transport Association (FTA).

FTA chief executive Richard Turner said: “Those pundits and commentators who are now picking apart the draft regulations and criticising, in some cases their clarity, and in others their enormous flexibility, are so out of touch.”

But haulage operators have also given the draft regulations a lukewarm reaction.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Barry Proctor, owner of Stoke-based Barry Proctor Services, said: “The Government has bent over backwards to make the regulations flexible, but I have sympathy with the unions because they don’t go far enough to protect drivers. There needs to be a cap on periods of availability because sometimes drivers can wait at retailers’ regional distribution centres for around five hours, which is draining and depressing, and then be expected to drive around the country for eight hours.”



 

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Offshoring improves business competitiveness
next post
As seen on screen

You may also like

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

Court rejects Liberty’s legal challenge against EHRC consultation

9 Jun 2025

US Supreme Court lowers burden of proof for...

6 Jun 2025

Institute of Directors demand reforms to Employment Rights...

6 Jun 2025

Employment Rights Bill: peers propose change to work...

4 Jun 2025

Facilities firms share ‘deep concerns’ on workers’ rights

4 Jun 2025

NDA ban vital to tackling misogyny in music...

4 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+