Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Zero hoursEmployment lawLatest NewsEconomics, government & businessEmployment contracts

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond the grave

by Adam McCulloch 8 May 2025
by Adam McCulloch 8 May 2025 Photo: Shutterstock
Photo: Shutterstock

Workers’ families and estates could be awarded compensation after their death if businesses breach a ban on zero-hours contracts under a government amendment to the Employment Rights Bill, now being considered in the House of Lords.

It is already the case that employment tribunal claims can be brought in some cases after the worker or boss has died, usually if it involves unfair dismissal, redundancy or other individual rights. Now, the principle is being extended as part of ministers’ Make Work Pay agenda.

The amendment will allow a representative, usually a close family member of the worker, or to act on the deceased worker’s behalf, with compensation being decided on the basis of financial loss, as with other claims.

Employment Rights Bill

The proposals must be tightened says influential think-tank

Employment Rights Bill: Six key changes to trade union laws

Employment Rights Bill: 12 key takeaways

Retail HRDs say Employment Rights Bill will have negative impact

Government whip Lord Leong told the Lords that the amendment would “ensure that, in the event of a worker’s death or the employer’s death – or the death of another respondent in the case of agency workers – tribunal proceedings under the zero-hours provisions can still be instituted, continued or defended as appropriate by a personal representative of the deceased”.

A government spokesman said: “It’s already the law under the existing Employment Rights Act that tribunal proceedings can continue on behalf of a deceased worker or employer. These minor changes to our new zero-hours measures ensure they are in line with existing employment rights.”

‘Wrecking ball for the part-time economy’

Meanwhile, some peers criticised the government for late changes to the bill, with Lord Wolfson of Aspley Guise, head of clothing retailer Next, said the attempt to buttress the rights of workers on zero-hours contracts would be a “wrecking ball for the part-time economy”.

He said: “My concern is the requirement to offer additional contract hours to those who voluntarily work extra hours will inadvertently prevent those additional hours being offered at all.

“I am not exaggerating when I say that, if the threshold for low-hours contracts is set too high, it will take a wrecking ball to the UK’s part-time economy. It will deprive millions of people of a valuable source of flexible income and multiple industries of the flexibility they need to offer excellent services in sectors where demand is variable and volatile.

“My worry is that the bill will make it almost impossible for businesses to offer additional voluntary hours to workers with contracts below the low-hour threshold.”

Other peers, such as Lord Fox, a Liberal Democrat peer, and Lord Hunt of Wirral, the Conservative shadow business minister, were critical of the number of amendments being made to the Bill, suggesting that the legislation had not been properly prepared.

‘Time to get behind the Bill’

However, Baroness O’Grady of Upper Holloway, the former general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, defended the proposed reforms. She said: “It is time to get on with and get behind this bill so that Britain takes the high road to improving business productivity by treating workers fairly as human beings and not just commodities.”

Liz Stevens, professional support lawyer in the employment team at Birketts LLP, told Personnel Today that the posthumous claim amendment was “only bringing the new provisions in line with existing legislation”.

She added: “In practice, it is very rare indeed for a claim to be pursued on behalf of a worker after they have died. It raises many practical issues in terms of the evidence available, and it is unlikely to be a priority for the individual’s family in most cases. There are a few reported examples of cases where an employee has died during the course of proceedings and personal representatives chose to continue it on behalf of the estate. This might be more likely in circumstances when most of the preparation (including disclosure of evidence) has already been done.

“The significant backlog of claims in the employment tribunals continues to rise, meaning that hearings are sometimes being listed several years after the events in question. Coupled with an ageing workforce, it is possible that we will start to see more claims being pursued by personal representatives in the future, but it is unlikely to represent a significant issue in practice for most employers.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
NHS worker awarded £29k after Darth Vader comparison

You may also like

How can businesses build protections for gig workers?

7 May 2025

Employment Rights Bill must be tightened to protect...

1 May 2025

CIPD calls for Employment Rights Bill clarity

6 Mar 2025

Employment Rights Bill: Agency workers and zero-hours contracts...

5 Mar 2025

Agency workers to be included in zero-hours clampdown

4 Mar 2025

Close loopholes that let rogue firms undercut best...

3 Mar 2025

McDonald’s: zero hours culture feeds sexual harassment allegations

10 Feb 2025

Zero-hours workers ‘stuck’ in long-term arrangements

3 Feb 2025

Recruiting seasonal workers: what does the future hold?

20 Jan 2025

Zero-hours laws could boost ‘false self-employment’

16 Jan 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+