Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Marriage and civil partnership discriminationPensions

Equalise pension survivor benefits for same-sex couples, urges TUC

by Jo Faragher 29 Jun 2015
by Jo Faragher 29 Jun 2015 Revellers at London's Pride festival. Andrea Baldo/NurPhoto/REX
Revellers at London's Pride festival. Andrea Baldo/NurPhoto/REX

The TUC is calling for the Government to review pension survivor benefits for same-sex couples, since civil partners or same-sex spouses are often left thousands of pounds worse off when their partner dies.

Equality resources

Marriage and civil partnership discrimination

Although surviving partners in same-sex relationships now have the right to claim a survivor pension from their late partner’s scheme, this only applies from 2005, when the Civil Partnership Act came into force, meaning that contributions made before this date do not count.

Widows, on the other hand, would be entitled to receive the full pension benefit.

The TUC believes there could be as many as 70,000 defined-benefit pension scheme members who could leave their pension benefits to a surviving partner, yet around a quarter of schemes do not treat same-sex partners in the same way as widows.

Thousands worse off

[typography font=”Molengo” size=”1″ size_format=”em” color=”#202020″]The TUC gives the example of married couple Peter Armstrong-Luckhurst and his husband Kristofer, who entered a civil partnership in 2009 and converted this to a marriage in 2014.
[/typography]
[typography font=”Molengo” size=”1″ size_format=”em” color=”#202020″]Armstrong-Luckhurst has paid into an NHS pension scheme for 16 years, and has also bought another four years’ worth of pensions credits.
[/typography]
[typography font=”Molengo” size=”1″ size_format=”em” color=”#202020″]As a heterosexual couple, if his spouse died, he would be entitled to £5,585.91 per year from this pension. As it stands, Kristofer would only receive £793.18 a year.[/typography]

[typography font=”Molengo” size=”1″ size_format=”em” color=”#202020″]“Hypothetically, I could divorce Kris in the last few weeks of my life and take a heterosexual partner who would be placed at a significant advantage, as a wife of a few weeks, compared to my husband, who has been my partner of nearly 25 years,” said Armstrong-Luckhurst.[/typography]

A year ago, the Government carried out a review of inequalities in survivor pensions as part of its duty under equal marriage legislation, but has not committed to changing the legislation or to backdate contributions.

This is despite the review showing that the cost of equalising survivor payouts would be negligible in most schemes, because only a relatively small number of people are expected to leave behind a same-sex spouse or civil partner.

TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady said: “It is a scandal that people are losing thousands of pounds every year, simply because they have a same-sex spouse or civil partner.

“The Government must remove the last hurdle to equality under the law and bring an end to the discrimination that could leave thousands of people in poverty at a time when they are grieving for a loved one.”

Employers that have already equalised survivor benefits include BP, the National Trust and the Royal Bank of Scotland.

This week, however, a Court of Appeal case could result in the regulations on survivor benefits being tested.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

In the case Walker v Innospec, John Walker’s former employer’s pension scheme would only pay £500 a year to his civil partner if he dies before him, despite 23 years of service, while if he were married to a woman she would receive £41,000 a year.

Walker made a successful tribunal claim for direct discrimination in 2013, but this was appealed last year, with the Department for Work and Pensions arguing that failing to backdate the contributions was not in contravention of EU law.

TUC
Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Women on maternity leave must keep childcare voucher benefits
next post
Almost half of employers at risk by failing to review restrictive covenants

You may also like

Pensions Commission launched to tackle low retirement savings

21 Jul 2025

Mansion House speech: will employers’ pension contributions rise?

15 Jul 2025

Pensions regulator: make sure summer staff don’t miss...

18 Jun 2025

Pension Schemes Bill should be ‘hugely beneficial’ for...

5 Jun 2025

Pension reforms could put savings at risk, group...

30 May 2025

HMRC releases research on removing salary sacrifice tax...

28 May 2025

TPT to launch multi-employer CDC pension scheme

12 May 2025

Millions at risk of retiring under-pensioned

30 Apr 2025

Union branch wants rights for polyamorous people

9 Apr 2025

Two-thirds of healthcare workers threaten to quit without...

31 Mar 2025

  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more
  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+