Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Reasonable adjustmentsEmployment lawDisabilityLatest NewsEmployment tribunals

On the case: reasonable adjustments and tribunal proceedings

by Kevin Lau 19 Feb 2020
by Kevin Lau 19 Feb 2020

Employers should be well aware of their obligations to make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees or job candidates. But what is allowed during tribunal proceedings? Should claimants be allowed to record proceedings? A recent case has shed light on the law in this area, reports Kevin Lau. 

The recent case of Heal v University of Oxford makes exciting reading for anyone who is interested in employment tribunal procedure, or plain fascinated by the provenance of obligations to make reasonable adjustments.

For everyone else, however, the case may seem rather unremarkable at first blush, but it is in fact worth organisations and individuals taking note.

Reasonable adjustments

How to deal with an employee who makes, or requests to make, a recording of a meeting  

Podcast: Duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled workers 

The case concerned an individual (who had dyslexia, dyspraxia and IBS aggravated by anxiety), making various claims of discrimination against the university.

Claimaint requirements

Dr Heal routinely completed a claim form as part of which he was asked whether he had any disabilities and what assistance he may require in that respect.

He indicated that he had disabilities and asked for a number of adjustments, including being permitted to make audio recordings of any hearings.

When the claim form came to be considered in August 2018, the judge decided that the best way to approach the requested adjustments was to deal with it at a preliminary hearing before the main hearing of the claim.

Not content with this outcome, the claimant asked for the decision to consider the adjustments in this manner be reconsidered, arguing in part that it was unfair to him that the audio recording request was not considered in advance of a preliminary hearing, as he would not know whether he could bring recording equipment along on the day.

A second judge considered the request in September 2018 and decided that a preliminary hearing was the fairest approach, as this would allow the claimant to explain why the adjustment he requested was required and reasonable.

The claimant appealed against both decisions at the Employment Appeal Tribunal, and after some to-ing and fro-ing, the claimant’s appeal was considered in July 2019 by president of the employment appeals tribunal, Mr Justice Choudhury.

Duty of tribunal on reasonable adjustments

However, he comprehensively rejected the claimant’s appeal and his judgment provides the following helpful guidance concerning the duty of the tribunal to consider reasonable adjustments:

  • Tribunals have a duty to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate disability, as a matter of fairness
  • However, the fact that a request for an adjustment has been made, does not equate to an entitlement to that adjustment
  • The tribunal has wide-reaching case management powers (set out in a body of rules), which can be used to determine what adjustments, if any, should be made.
  • If a party requests an adjustment, the tribunal may generally deal with the request on paper, or at a hearing, and there may be good reasons a tribunal may decide on a reasonable adjustment ahead of a hearing, with the example of tribunal building access being given

Specifically in relation to audio recordings, tribunals may wish to consider all relevant matters, which could include:

  • Medical evidence concerning the disability, and the extent of any disadvantage
  • Whether permitting audio recording would alleviate the disadvantage, or whether there are other means which might assist
  • Views of the other parties and how permission to record would impact them
  • Practical issues such as the means of the recordings, whether these would be shared, how they would be used, possible disruptions, risks of recordings being misused, and any conditions attached to any permission given

Individuals’ rights

Individuals who want to record tribunal proceedings need to obtain the tribunal’s permission, or risk being in contempt of court if they do record the proceedings without permission.

Even where permission is granted, it is likely to be granted with stringent conditions attached, and any publication or playing of the recording in public could amount to contempt.

Individuals seeking permission should be prepared to explain and provide supporting evidence as to how the use of audio recording would alleviate their disadvantage, and to consider whether less extreme measures would suffice, perhaps by asking a friend to take notes, and asking for more time to formulate questions.

Tips for employers

Where a claimant makes an application to record a hearing, the employer is entitled to make its views known.

A litany of practical issues come to mind; having a recording could intimidate witnesses, it could create unfairness if the recording isn’t shared with the employer, the recording and playback will likely add to the length of any hearings, such a recording could be misused and made public, and most importantly, a recording device could capture privileged discussions between other parties and their lawyers.

Employers should therefore consider such issues carefully before responding to such an application.

Separately, employers should bear in mind that the above decision does not have any bearing on the use of recording devices during internal procedures.

As a reminder, an employer’s policy will often set out clear guidance on whether the recording of any meeting is permitted or otherwise, and where they are not permitted, the taking of a covert recording could be regarded as misconduct.

The need for recording during a disciplinary is often lessened due to the presence of a formal note taker, with a copy of the notes being provided to the employee to agree.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

However, if the employer receives a request from an employee citing a disability and requesting that a reasonable adjustment be made to allow the hearing or meeting to be recorded, employers would then need to consider the request in the same way as any other request for a reasonable adjustment.

Employee relations opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more Employee Relations jobs

Kevin Lau

Kevin Lau is a solicitor in Blake Morgan's Employment law team with offices in Cardiff, Southampton, London, Oxford, Reading and Portsmouth.

previous post
Movers and shakers: HR appointments – changes ahead at Google
next post
Learning Technologies 2020: Time to make it personal

You may also like

Jobs on the line across NHS trusts in...

9 May 2025

Why fighting the DEI backlash is about PR...

9 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Rumours during recruitment: how should HR respond?

9 May 2025

UK-US deal saves ‘thousands’ of jobs in car...

9 May 2025

Teacher apprenticeship route to be tied to school...

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

NHS worker awarded £29k after Darth Vader comparison

8 May 2025

Senior execs at BlackRock to work in office...

8 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+