Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawDisciplineDiscipline and grievancesDismissal

The Seven Deadly Sins of Discipline

by Personnel Today 16 Nov 2004
by Personnel Today 16 Nov 2004

Beware the following:


 


1. ‘Leap frogging’


 


Employers often skip stages of the disciplinary process when their frustration with an employee leads them to make a snap decision to sack them. But by disregarding the correct procedure, bosses could find themselves in an employment tribunal, facing claims of unfair dismissal.


 


2. Burying your head in the sand


 


Sometimes known as the ‘Ostrich Manoeuvre’, and common in cases of misconduct or poor performance, employers frequently choose to bury their head in the sand and do nothing. This approach means the employee is often unaware of the problem. However, the onus and legal responsibility is on the employer to ensure staff are aware of acceptable standards and disciplinary procedures.


 


3. ‘Where angels fear to tread’


 


Employers often fail to know the difference between acting promptly when a problem occurs and dashing in ‘all guns blazing where angels fear to tread’. Bosses must gather the facts of a case before proceeding with any action, even if an employee has been caught ‘red-handed’.


 


4. Failure to keep proper records


 


Employers commonly ignore the importance of collecting data regarding a disciplinary incident as soon as possible after it happens. Witness statements, records and the testimony of the ‘accused’ are all vital, particularly if the matter goes any further.


 


5. Making assumptions about employees


 


Bosses need to be fair and, more importantly, be seen to be fair. They must ensure they investigate all the facts of a case, including the employee’s account of the incident, and be as objective as possible. Relevant personal details, such as work experience, length of service and any current warnings against the employee, must all be considered.


 


6. Inconsistency


 


Unless employers can prove that staff in disciplinary situations had all been taken through the same procedures and framework, they risk being accused of unfair dismissal unless there are mitigating circumstances that clearly distinguish between different cases.


 


7. ‘The Sausage Machine’


 


While it is important to be consistent, it is crucial employers realise that their disciplinary procedure is not simply a sausage machine churning out set outcomes. Each case must be considered on its own merits and the personal details of the employee in question, such as length of service, past disciplinary history and any current warnings, should be considered relevant. Any decision to discipline an employee must be reasonable, and must not discriminate on grounds of race, gender, disability, religious belief or sexual orientation.


 


Russell says disciplining or dismissing a member of staff may seem straightforward but the procedure can be a minefield for the employer. “With unfair dismissal compensation claims now capable of resulting in payments of more than £50,000, bosses need to be absolutely sure they know how to implement and carry out their disciplinary procedure in a way that protects them and the business, and ensures the employee is treated fairly and lawfully,” she says.


 


Kate Russell is author of Can I Sack the B*****d? A Practical Guide to Discipline and Dismissal


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 


Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Blunkett claims ID cards will beat exploitation of migrants
next post
Number’s up for HR as IT drives ahead in status game

You may also like

Gregg Wallace case: don’t be too hasty to...

11 Jul 2025

Ministers loosen fire and rehire proposals in Employment...

10 Jul 2025

Court of Appeal rules that Ryanair agency pilot...

9 Jul 2025

Employment Rights Bill set to ban employer NDAs

8 Jul 2025

Bereavement leave to extend to miscarriages before 24...

7 Jul 2025

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

‘Be direct’ to avoid escalating conflict, advises Acas

30 Jun 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+