Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Palace blunder highlights dangers of job references

by Personnel Today 2 Dec 2003
by Personnel Today 2 Dec 2003

If the Queen of England managed to have the wool pulled over her eyes,
employers better be even more discerning when looking at information on
applicants’ CVs

Most employers ask job applicants for references. So did Buckingham Palace
when it hired a trainee footman, who later turned out to be Ryan Parry, an
undercover reporter for the Daily Mirror.

In a completely fabricated CV, the journalist gave the employer two
references: one from a fictitious paint firm, the other from a pub where he had
worked, but which had since changed hands. A ‘reference’ was given to the
Palace over the telephone by a pub regular.

This is an extreme case, but surveys show that job applicants often lie
about their educational qualifications, salaries, previous experience, job
titles, committed offences, and sometimes even their age. It has been estimated
that more than a quarter of applicants’ CVs may contain serious ‘inaccuracies’.

Many employers are now reluctant to give detailed written or oral
references. If inaccurate, they can be challenged by a disgruntled ex-employee
or an unhappy new employer – for example, on grounds of negligent
mis-statement.

The referee owes a duty of care in compiling the reference, both to the
recipient of the reference and to the subject of the reference. They must
ensure it is true, accurate and fair in substance, and it must not give a
misleading impression to the recipient.

In one case (TSB Bank plc v Harris [2000] IRLR 157), an employee succeeded
in a constructive dismissal claim against her employer, who had given an
accurate but unflattering reference. It referred to customer complaints made
against her, of which she was unaware.

Referees should note that although a reference is given in confidence, the
person could access a copy of it from the recipient through a subject access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998.

If an employer decides to give a reference at all, it has become increasingly
common practice for them to merely confirm objective factual matters, such as
the start date, end date and job held.

A reference therefore may not actually be much help in assessing the
suitability of an applicant for the job. However, provided it genuinely comes
from a previous employer, a reference may be useful to confirm facts in a CV.

Still, employers should consider what other steps can be taken to verify
information about a job applicant. For example, it may be wise to check
academic and professional qualifications – these days, it is not difficult to
acquire impressive-looking but worthless certificates.

They should also bear in mind the recommendation from the Employment
Practices Data Protection Code, that job applicants should be told that the
information they have given in their CVs will be verified.

Employers should note that ‘vetting’ (such as broader background checks)
should only be undertaken where there are special risks involved in hiring
employees.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

An employer duped into hiring an applicant by false references or other
misleading information will be able to dismiss them.

Employers may have other legal remedies – for example, they could obtain an
injunction if a bogus employee discloses confidential information, as happened
in the Daily Mirror ‘footman’ case, But of course, it is far better to pick up
the problem before the job is offered.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Holiday bonus for UK businesses
next post
Unions demand action over work drugs tests

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+