Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Q&A

by Personnel Today 10 Sep 2002
by Personnel Today 10 Sep 2002

This week’s legal questions and answers

Q I am an HR Manager, and approximately 40 per cent of our firm’s workers
are on fixed-term contracts. I understand the new regulations protecting
fixed-term workers will shortly come into force, and we are considering not
entering into any new fixed-term contracts. Presumably the new regulations will
not affect existing workers?

A The new regulations were initially due to come into force in July
of this year, but will now come in on 1 October 2002. They will broadly ensure
that workers on fixed-term contracts do not have any less favourable terms –
including pay and pension provisions – than comparable permanent employees.

This will therefore entitle them to the same benefits as your permanent
staff, unless there are objective reasons for the less favourable treatment.

The regulations also limit the use of successive fixed-term contracts up to
a combined period of four years.

Importantly, the new regulations will affect all employees already on
fixed-term contracts, and your existing workers will benefit from 1 October.
Any dismissal for reasons linked with the enforcement of these regulations,
will automatically be deemed unfair.

Q I deal with a lot of recruitment for a company which is part of a large
group. I tend to keep all job applications, whether they are on spec or for
specific positions, for anything up to a year. If I think it is appropriate, I
pass the CVs to other parts of the group, and I wondered whether I could be
criticised for doing this under the data protection legislation.

A The only section of the Information Commissioner’s code of practice
on employer/employee relations that has been issued so far, is the section
dealing with recruitment, which will help with the point you raise.

As a company, you should establish retention periods for recruitment records
that are based on ‘business needs’. Given that any claim arising out of the
recruitment process should be made within three months, a retention period of
up to six months is likely to be acceptable.

However, unsuccessful candidates should be told how long their details are
going to be kept, so that they have the opportunity to request that they be
removed. Passing on CVs throughout the company is likely to be a breach of the
data protection legislation unless the individual has been informed that this
may happen.

Q I have been asked to write a reference for a former employee. He
brought a sex discrimination claim against the company, and while I want to
write a fair reference, I am concerned that it may result in further hassle for
me. Would I be better off not writing a reference at all?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A If your reason for not giving him a reference is that he had
previously brought a discrimination claim against the company, he would be
entitled to bring a further claim for victimisation, even though he is no
longer an employee. It is important to follow your usual procedures on
references and not to treat him any differently.

David Green is head of the employment and pensions unit at Charles
Russell

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Amicus chief calls time on ‘sweetheart deals’
next post
Driving is most popular way of getting to work

You may also like

Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders receive 400% pay rise

4 Jul 2025

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+