Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Agency workersEmployee relationsEmployment lawEconomics, government & businessHR practice

Agency Workers Directive: A new push on the legislation controlling temporary workers’ rights

by Ross Wigham 17 Sep 2007
by Ross Wigham 17 Sep 2007

The controversial Agency Workers Directive (AWD) has been hanging over the British workplace for almost all of the new millennium but despite an uneasy cease-fire in recent time the battle lines are once again being drawn.

The Agency Workers Directive has had innumerable false starts – even judging by the notoriously laborious progress of most EU legislation – with countless revival attempts and blocking moves played out across the continent.

However, renewed pressure from the EU and a push from the Trades Union Congress (TUC) could see the proposals brought back to life yet again.

Temps rights

The directive, which would essentially give temporary staff exactly the same rights as full-time employees after just six weeks, is sure to have employers bodies and trade unionists at loggerheads after a long, uneasy stalemate.

The long-running debate is one that tends to polarise opinion: employers argue that it would destroy flexibility and cost jobs, while trade unions claim it would help prevent exploitation of vulnerable workers.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber used congress to call for a new push on the legislation.

“I urge the government as strongly as I possibly can – let’s see action to deliver the promised European Directive – to give agency workers justice and dignity, and if that can’t be achieved quickly then let’s get on with the necessary measures here in the UK.”

CBI research

However, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) countered this with research that claims the introduction of the AWD could cost as many as 250,000 jobs in the UK.

The survey, carried out in partnership with employment agency Pertemps, found that 58% of the 500 firms questioned would be forced to cut the number of temporary placements if the law was passed as drafted.

CBI deputy director-general John Cridland said the AWD would undermine the benefits of using temps and threaten the existence of the very workers it is designed to protect.

“This important section of the workforce has an uncertain future if the government caves into pressure for a new EU law. Hundreds of thousands of jobs will be put at risk unless Gordon Brown rejects it outright, or at least insists on a qualifying period of a year before full employment rights apply to a temporary post.

“As proposed, the directive would seriously undermine the flexibility that temps offer to firms, hurting the economy and making them far more likely to rely on overtime flexibility from existing workers instead,” he said.

Employers concerns

Jonathan Maude, head of employment at law firm Manches, said the developments would be a big concern for British companies which are the biggest employers of temporary workers in Europe.

“From a UK standpoint this directive would probably be the worst possible thing that could happen. I appreciate that the unions will have a different view but agency workers already have a lot of legal protection.

“I think it would be a case of the EU over-legislating in an area where it’s not really needed,” he said.

Helen Reynolds, acting chief executive officer of the Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC), agreed that the directive would prove too restrictive and jeopardise thousands of temporary jobs.

“This would have serious consequences for the thousands of temporary workers that choose agency work for a level of flexibility that simply isn’t possible in permanent positions,” she explained.

David Yeandle, deputy director of employment policy at employers body Engineering Employers’ Federation (EEF), said the positions of both sides has not changed in recent years, so any resolution could still be a long way off.

“I wouldn’t say we’re at a red-light stage but we could be on amber, because a lot of pressure will be coming from the TUC.

“Realistically I think it will be difficult to revive this directive in the current form as it’s already been stalled for a long, long time. I don’t think the government are opposed to a directive in principle but it must be one that’s right for Britain.”

TUC on the war-path

However, strong words from Barber seem to suggest that a new fight is already underway.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“I am disappointed to see the CBI opposing any idea of proper European regulation of employment agencies. The CBI used to oppose the minimum wage too,” Barber said.

“Now is the time to think again about employment agencies. It’s time for another minimum wage moment.”




Ross Wigham

previous post
AUDIO: Personnel Today Friday Podcast
next post
Whitehall HR failings over unfair dismissals cost £628,632 in 2006-07

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Public sector workers gain pay rises of up...

22 May 2025

UK net migration slashed by half in one...

22 May 2025

Workplace stress: Why it’s time to rebrand resilience

22 May 2025

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Pay awards in real terms could fall for...

21 May 2025

Ryanair demands flight attendants pay back salary increase

21 May 2025

UK and EU agree to collaborate on ‘youth...

19 May 2025

Immigration white paper: which jobs will be affected?

19 May 2025

Public sector needs 92,000 more workers to remain...

19 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+