Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Equality, diversity and inclusionDisabilityHR strategyOpinion

Disability Discrimination Act means rethinking redeployment and disability

by Personnel Today 18 Feb 2008
by Personnel Today 18 Feb 2008

Redeployment procedures need to be adjusted to accommodate the requirements of the DDA.

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA) is now comfortably into its second decade, but for employers and employees alike, there remain certain grey areas about their obligations and the protections that are available.

A prescriptive route map for all situations is unrealistic and employers are, quite rightly, waiting for case law guidance.

Supporting

The Disability Rights Commission (DRC), whose responsibilities have now been subsumed by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), had a strong track record of supporting cases that clarified the general application of the law. The commission also provided help for employers in understanding and implementing the DDA’s statutory code of practice.

One area which really needs further work – and one which it is hoped that the EHRC will focus on – is managing changes to existing roles and redeployment for disabled employees.

‘Transferring’ to fill an existing vacancy extends to considerations of potential promotion and not merely posts of a similar or lesser level. But this is insufficiently clear in the guidance.

The House of Lords has said that it will be necessary to consider adjustments to redeployment procedures where an employee may be required to participate in a competitive interview process before any appointment can be made.

Employers will need to consider whether it is reasonable to transfer an employee into a new position. However, it is possible to take into account the likely suitability and nature of the new role, and there is no obligation to promote to a position where there is no potential suitability.

Obligation

Case law also indicates that while there cannot be an obligation on an employer to create a post (which is not otherwise necessary) specifically to retain a disabled person, there may be circumstances in which it would be reasonable to devise an entirely new job for a disabled employee.

The extremes of the spectrum vary from there being no obligation to promote an administrative assistant with limited experience to become department head to redesigning a job specification during a period of reorganisation and to prioritise that role for the disabled employee.

Additions to the guidance would be helpful, both to draw further attention to these elements, and to indicate factors or examples of how to bridge the gap in between. For example, if a role is demonstrably time critical, with limited suitable candidates in the market, it may well be acceptable for an employer to move quickly to appoint to a permanent role, notwithstanding a disabled employee’s potential suitability after, say, six months of training.

Reasonable factors include: the financial costs that would be incurred in taking the step and the level of disruption to other activities of the employer the extent of its financial and other resources and the availability to the employer of financial or other assistance to take the required step.

Funding

The latter refers particularly to potential support through the Access to Work scheme, which can fund up to 100% of the adjustment costs incurred as a result of employing a disabled person.

Hopefully, the EHRC will continue to build on the fine traditions of the DRC in seeking to strike a reasonable balance and in explaining practically how that could or should be done.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Robert Davies, Partner, Dundas & Wilson

Employer obligations

  • Employers will be well aware of their obligation to make reasonable adjustments in cases where a provision, criterion or practice places a disabled person at a substantial disadvantage.
  • An employer has to take reasonable steps to prevent that disadvantage, and there is no defence of justification for failure to comply.
  • The DDA provides non-exhaustive lists of steps to be considered, but there are still many grey areas for employers.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Andrew Miller MP calls on HR to rethink long-term agency contracts
next post
Union fears for future of Northern Rock employees following nationalisation decision

You may also like

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Redefining leadership: From competence to inclusion

21 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

University of Salford launches Better Working Lives cluster

14 May 2025

Why HR burnout is a strategic issue

12 May 2025

Why fighting the DEI backlash is about PR...

9 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+