Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Age discriminationPoliceCase lawRetirement

A19 police retirements not age discrimination – Court of Appeal

by Rob Moss 2 Feb 2017
by Rob Moss 2 Feb 2017

The Court of Appeal has ruled that police forces’ use of Regulation A19, which required police officers with more than 30 years’ pensionable service to retire, did not amount to age discrimination.

The judgment in Chief Constable of West Midlands Police and others v Harrod and others is yet to be published, but the case was dismissed yesterday in court. Full analysis will be published on XpertHR when the ruling is made available.

The ruling upholds a decision by the Employment Appeal Tribunal to overturn the original 2014 judgment that requiring officers to retire under Regulation A19 of the Police Pensions Regulations 1987 is not “a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim,” a justification for discrimination under the Equality Act.

HR in the police service

Introduction to HR in the police service

Police service governance and related organisations

Police staff, special constables and volunteers

Policing context and strategic HR issues

The A19 rule allows police forces to make an officer of the rank of chief superintendent or below to retire “in the general interests of efficiency”.

As well as West Midlands Police, forces in North Wales, South Wales, Nottinghamshire, and Devon and Cornwall were involved in the claim.

Just under 100 officers left Nottinghamshire Police in 2011-12 under the A19 rule. Deputy chief constable Simon Torr said: “The decision made, by the command team at the time, to employ Regulation A19 was very difficult and followed extensive consultation.

“It is without question that we lost some very talented, experienced and dedicated officers during this period and we do not underestimate the impact on the officers, their families and the force as a whole.

“However, it was at that time of deep austerity in which the organisation had little other option to meet the financial demands and this measure was seen as a last resort.”

Dave Keen, chairman of Nottinghamshire Police Federation, said: “We note the decision of the Court of Appeal and are disappointed for our former members. We recognise this decision was taken at the time of challenging austerity and are equally aware that there are still difficult times ahead for Nottinghamshire Police.

“In that respect we accept the decision and look forward to working with the force to obtain the very best for our members.”

Devon and Cornwall Police chief constable Shaun Sawyer said: “The use of A19 was a very difficult decision which resulted in us losing some very experienced, committed and able police officers at all ranks.

“This ruling does not represent a case has been won, because in reality, the force lost hugely dedicated and loyal members of our police family who served the people of Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly.

This ruling does not represent a case has been won, because in reality, the force lost hugely dedicated and loyal members of our police family” – Shaun Sawyer, Devon and Cornwall Police.

“It was always likely this would have significant impact on people who had dedicated themselves to serving this force and the people of Devon and Cornwall for many years, but the force felt there was no viable alternative to meet the enormous financial challenges we faced then, and continue to face in 2017.”

Tim Jackson, national secretary of the Police Superintendents’ Association of England and Wales, said it was disappointed that the Court of Appeal has dismissed the case: “The association believes Regulation A19 was never intended for use en masse. We supported this appeal, and the legal action before it, as we believed that Regulation A19 was unfairly and unlawfully applied to our former members and led to the premature and discriminatory loss of their livelihoods.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“On this basis, as a staff association it is our duty to support our former members who were affected by the mass use of Regulation A19.

“These were very experienced police officers who still had much to contribute to policing and who felt they were treated unfairly in being forced to retire even though they were able, and willing, to serve their communities for years to come.”

Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. Rob specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and energy markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
Deaths from cancer set to fall
next post
Obesity survey finds more than one in four English adults are overweight

1 comment

Richard Morley 24 Feb 2018 - 7:35 am

Short sighted and unsafe. All that experience that could have been past onto new staff. It’s hard to understand how a Government who are there to protect it’s citizens could leave the nation so vulnerable to terrorism. Police Officers who been forced to leave after 30 years of service would have dealt with all the procedures surrounding the I.R.A.We are now swamped with returning Muslim terrorists who are hardened fighters and are pepared to rain a war on the streets of the UK God help us.
.

Comments are closed.

You may also like

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

TPT to launch multi-employer CDC pension scheme

12 May 2025

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

Millions at risk of retiring under-pensioned

30 Apr 2025

Trans ex-judge to appeal Supreme Court biological sex...

29 Apr 2025

EHRC: Interim update on single-sex spaces draws criticism

28 Apr 2025

Firearms officers to be granted anonymity

25 Apr 2025

Police who fail vetting checks face automatic dismissal

23 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+