Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Age discriminationEquality, diversity and inclusion

Age regulations

by Personnel Today 20 Sep 2005
by Personnel Today 20 Sep 2005

Will we still be able to set our own retirement ages?

Yes. According to the draft Employment Equality (Age) Regulations, compulsory retirement ages will not be unlawful per se.

Employers will still be able to set their own retirement ages, but if it is below the national default retirement age of 65, then any dismissal will be unlawful under the age regulations unless it can be objectively justified. If the retirement age is at or above the default retirement age of 65, then any dismissal will be lawful under the regulations.

Whether or not the dismissal is fair under the Employment Rights Act 1996 will depend, to a large extent, on whether or not the employer has followed the new “duty to consider” procedure.

Employers may wish to dispense with a compulsory retirement age altogether. But if you want to change your organisation’s contractual retirement age, you will need to consult about the change, as this will amount to a variation of an employee’s contract of employment.

What changes should we make to our contractual redundancy scheme?

You should review your redundancy policy in light of the government’s proposed changes to the statutory scheme (in the draft regulations) to ensure it is age-compliant. In particular, you should make sure that:



  • any lower or upper age limits on payment entitlements are removed unless there is a good reason for them
  • any ‘multiplier’ based on wide age brackets is removed unless there is a good reason for it. For example, if a scheme offers employees four weeks’ pay for each year of employment between the ages of 42 and 64, two weeks’ pay for each year of employment between the ages of 22 and 41 and one week’s pay for each year of employment under the age of 21, these wide age brackets will have to be removed. However, if it simply offers two weeks’ pay for each year of employment, this will not be a problem, as it does not differentiate on grounds of age
  • any selection criteria are objective and non-discriminatory. In particular, age should not be used as a criterion for selecting employees for redundancy. A ‘last in/first out’ policy is likely to affect a greater number of younger employees, and therefore may indirectly discriminate on the grounds of age.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The government is preserving the two-year qualifying period for entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment, and the requirement to take into account an employee’s length of service when calculating any such payment. Any contractual scheme will remain lawful to the extent it mirrors these requirements.

Any proposed changes to a contractual scheme will require consultation.

What are the implications for pension schemes?

The regulations will have very little impact on occupational pension schemes, as most age-related rules or practices will be exempt. However, employers and trustees/managers of an occupational pension scheme should carry out a review of the scheme to identify any age-related provisions, and ensure they fall within one of the specific exemptions, or can be objectively justified.

Will the statutory dismissal procedures apply to dismissals on grounds of retirement?

According to the consultation document, the statutory dismissal procedure will not apply to retirement dismissals. Employers will simply have to follow the new “duty to consider” procedure.




Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
SMEs continue to ignore business continuity issues
next post
Equal pay questionnaires

You may also like

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

Pride 2025: why corporate allyship still matters

16 Jun 2025

HR is second ‘most sexist profession’ survey suggests

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

NDA ban vital to tackling misogyny in music...

4 Jun 2025

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+