Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Collective bargainingEmployee relationsEmployment lawDispute resolutionLegal sector

Crucial collective bargaining case reaches Supreme Court

by Adam McCulloch 17 May 2021
by Adam McCulloch 17 May 2021 Photo: Lazyllama / Shutterstock
Photo: Lazyllama / Shutterstock

Over 18 and 19 May the Supreme Court will hear an appeal about collective bargaining that could have a major impact on employment law and HR policies.

Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and Others will decide whether organisations are able to negotiate directly with staff where trade unions hold collective bargaining rights.

The case could give employers the freedom to agree changes with their staff directly in scenarios where talks with the union have broken down.

Usually, employers avoid direct negotiations with staff when negotiations with the union have broken down because they fear having to pay financial penalties.

In the original case (which was about the timing and amount of a Christmas bonus), the union Unite had argued that in contacting staff directly, Kostal had attempted to avoid collective bargaining, prohibited under the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act.

The employment tribunal and employment appeal tribunal agreed, and ordered the employer to pay £400,000 in compensation to 55 members of staff.

Collective bargaining

Trade union recognition

How to negotiate terms and conditions with a trade union

Kostal appealed, arguing that it never intended to induce employees to opt out of collective bargaining. It argued that the fact it continued to negotiate with the union and reached a subsequent agreement on pay was proof of this.

In June 2019, the Court of Appeal held that Kostal had written to staff to circumvent collective bargaining, but because it was a temporary measure it was not unlawful and staff hadn’t been asked to relinquish the right for their union to represent them. The court said that trade unions with collective bargaining rights could not prevent employers approaching staff directly to try to agree temporary changes to terms of employment where negotiations with the union have broken down.

However, the union has appealed to the Supreme Court.

Whatever the Supreme Court decides, its decision will impact on any organisation where collective bargaining remains a key feature of negotiation when agreeing changes to terms and conditions of employment. It will be particularly significant in the public sector.

Glenn Hayes, a partner and employment law specialist at Irwin Mitchell said: “Prior to the Court of Appeal ruling, it was almost impossible for organisations to make even minor temporary changes to terms and conditions of employment without union agreement, as any mistake could risk huge financial penalties.

“For many unionised employers, the appeal court ruling came as a relief, as it give them scope to communicate directly with their staff – provided they attempted, in good faith, to agree terms with the union first.

“Although the decision was controversial, we believe that the Court of Appeal reached a fair compromise on the facts of this particular case. Prior to this, many employers have become very risk averse and agreed to union demands rather than face the possibility of having their decisions scrutinised by employment tribunals – not least because of the huge penalties involved if they get it wrong. Awards are fixed and tribunals can’t reduce them like they can in other claims – even if they have sympathy with the employer.

“However, there are still questions that remain unanswered. If the Supreme Court upholds the Court of Appeal’s decision, we hope that it will put some more flesh on the bones of the scope of this exemption. For example, what happens if pay negotiations break down for a second or third time? Can the employer still write to its staff directly without risk if the changes are temporary rather than permanent? And how much effort must an employer make to agree terms with a recognised union before it can safely approach its staff?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“There’s still a lot riding on the ultimate outcome for employers, staff and unions, making this case one of the most significant for employment law in recent times.”

HR Director opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more HR director jobs

Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
Long working hours leading to heart disease and stroke
next post
Daniel Kahneman: how ‘noise’ damages decisions

You may also like

Employment Rights Bill must be tightened to protect...

1 May 2025

Trump orders closure of US mediation body in...

27 Mar 2025

Tesco announces pay rise for store employees

18 Mar 2025

Employment Rights Bill: Six key changes to trade...

5 Mar 2025

Consultation: a new framework for industrial relations

22 Oct 2024

Unlawful inducement and collective bargaining: why the employer’s...

18 Sep 2024

Supreme Court: Tesco workers triumph in fire and...

12 Sep 2024

‘Potentially disastrous’: Lawyers react to Tesco fire and...

12 Sep 2024

Right to switch off would boost productivity –...

20 Aug 2024

Aslef recommends train drivers accept 15% pay offer

15 Aug 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+