Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Collective redundancyEmployee relationsEmployment lawInformation & consultationRedundancy

Collective redundancies: 10 do’s and don’ts

by Personnel Today 25 Mar 2010
by Personnel Today 25 Mar 2010

One of the most expensive liabilities an employer can face arises from a failure to comply with collective consultation obligations.

The risk of protective awards of up to 90 days’ uncapped pay per affected employee, coupled with the possibility of unfair dismissal compensation if due process is not followed, means that employers must take great care to comply with their statutory duties where 20 or more redundancies are proposed in a 90-day period.

1. Don’t delay consultation

Don’t delay starting consultation just because other cost-cutting measures are still on the table, or because you do not yet have all the relevant information about proposed redundancies. Case law is clear that collective consultation is an organic process and that information can (and should) be fed through to representatives as and when it becomes available.

2. Do have appropriate representatives in place before you begin consulting

If 20 or more redundancies are proposed within a 90-day period, ensure “appropriate representatives” are in place before starting to consult individually with those at risk. Appropriate representatives of the affected employees will typically be trade union representatives or members of an employee forum elected internally for consultation purposes.

3. Do consider front-loading your collective consultation process

Once you have determined that a 30- or 90-day consultation process will be required, it makes sense to front-load that process where possible so it is completed in good time and ideally before individual redundancy consultation begins.

4. Do present information clearly, with enough detail to enable meaningful consultation

Take care when drafting information communications to representatives. Consultation must be meaningful, and unless information is given in such a way that the reader is able to understand the proposals properly, there is a real risk of a tribunal finding the consultation process a sham. Avoid “management speak” where possible, using plain English instead.









XpertHR answers key collective redundancy questions




  • What information must the employer disclose prior to redundancy consultations?
  • In a collective redundancy situation, what should the workforce be consulted about?
  • What should an employer do if it cannot accept proposals made by trade union or employee representatives during a collective redundancy procedure?
 5. Do consider who should manage the selection process

Ensure the manager conducting the scoring exercise does so armed with adequate and relevant knowledge of the skills and experience of those within the pool at risk. Objectively verifiable evidence should be available to support and explain the scores given to individuals – for instance, appraisals or sales figures (where appropriate). Managers should take care not to rely simply on personal feedback.

6. Don’t lay unnecessary paper trails

 All too often an otherwise well-planned redundancy process is hampered in subsequent litigation by unhelpful documents created before or during the process. Managers should be reminded before consultation starts that relevant written documents can be disclosed in litigation. Encourage verbal discussions instead of e-mails, and keep your legal team closely involved in any written communications so privilege can be retained where possible.

7. Don’t just go through the motions of searching for suitable alternative roles

Searching for alternative employment opportunities for individuals at risk of redundancy forms part of an employer’s duty to ensure a redundancy process is fair and reasonable. Merely asking the employee to submit their CV to the company will not suffice. Don’t assume that an employee who has been placed at risk of redundancy in one role will therefore be unsuitable for vacancies in other areas of your organisation. Keep an open mind.

8. Do bear in mind your actions during the consultation process









XpertHR Good practice guide



While informing and consulting in a redundancy situation is a legal requirement, thorough provision of information and effective consultation can lead to fewer interruptions to business and costs savings during the redundancy process, as the XpertHR Good practice guide on informing and consulting during a collective redundancy process explains.

Consider how you will deal with individuals not required to come into the office for the duration of the consultation process. Will your actions serve to indicate that a decision has already been made? You should also consider what message colleagues should give clients (if asked) about the reason for the at risk employee’s absence.

9. Don’t forget about the HR1

Employers proposing collective dismissals must remember to notify the secretary of state at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) using form HR1. This notification should be sent on the same day that collective consultation begins, and a copy must be given to the appropriate employee representatives. If numbers increase, it is important to update BIS accordingly. But proposed dismissals already notified to BIS should not be included in the calculation of subsequent redundancies for this purpose. A failure to notify BIS is a criminal offence carrying potential fines of up to £5,000.

10. Don’t forget to consult individually

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Remember that even the most thorough collective consultation process will not negate the need to consult individually with employees at risk. Employers who fail to consult individually as well as collectively run the risk of a tribunal finding that any ultimate dismissal was unfair. Usually, only employee representatives can bring claims about a failure to consult collectively, but individuals may bring them where workplaces have failed to appoint representatives.

Kate Novak, senior associate, Jones Day

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Fit note: bill of health
next post
Working Time Directive review could cost employers

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+