Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Vexatious claimsEquality, diversity and inclusionRace discrimination

DWP sends out bogus job applications to test for discrimination

by John Charlton 1 Jul 2009
by John Charlton 1 Jul 2009

Thousands of bogus job applications have been sent out by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) to test whether employers are discriminating against applicants with foreign-sounding names.

Some 3,000 such applications were sent out between November 2008 and May 2009, according to the DWP, in response to “real” jobs that were advertised in the press and online. Applicants’ details for each job were “carefully matched” though not identical.

Employers who offered interviews to the bogus applicants were put through to a phone number where their offer was declined.

A DWP spokeswoman said that “although the full results are not yet in, they are indicating that employers do still discriminate against people solely on the basis of having an ethnic minority name and we will be considering how to… reduce such an unfair outcome.”

The DWP insisted that employers’ details will remain anonymous and their responses will be treated “in confidence”.

The DWP added that although the idea of amending the Equality Bill to include something that could ban employers from asking for applicants’ names had been discussed, the idea was “withdrawn”.

The British Chambers of Commerce said it was “shocked” to learn about the DWP exercise.

“Businesses have enough on their plate without having to deal with the underhand tactics of the DWP,” said a spokesman.

Employment lawyer Pam Loch, of Loch Associates, said: “The government’s approach can be viewed as a positive step to combat discrimination. However, these sort of tactics can also be rather dubious given that it can encourage others to do the same while they may only be seeking financial gain.

“There have been instances in the past where claimants have used similar tactics, abusing the system to feather their nests and subsequently being declared vexatious litigants. The government should be prudent with their methods of enforcing equality in the workplace to ensure they are not seen to be condoning the use of underhand tactics.”

The DWP exercise was commissioned by its ethnic minority taskforce, which is looking to address discrimination against jobseekers from ethnic minority backgrounds.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

In May, Liberal Democrat Lynne Featherstone called for initial job applications to be anonymous.

The DWP said it will use the research to help judge overall levels of discrimination in the jobs market.

John Charlton

previous post
Office dress codes should be relaxed as UK heatwave, says TUC
next post
British Airways and unions resume cost-cutting talks

You may also like

Ethnicity and disability pay gaps: Ready to report?...

1 Jul 2025

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

AI company did not racially discriminate against Chinese...

20 Jun 2025

Barts nurse told to remove watermelon image claims...

19 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

Pride 2025: why corporate allyship still matters

16 Jun 2025

HR is second ‘most sexist profession’ survey suggests

13 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+