Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Business continuityCoronavirusLatest NewsEmployment lawTrade unions

Dyson return to work plan delayed by employee objections

by Adam McCulloch 22 May 2020
by Adam McCulloch 22 May 2020 Dyson Malmesbury plant, pictured a few years ago.
Photo: PA Images
Dyson Malmesbury plant, pictured a few years ago.
Photo: PA Images

Staff at engineering firm Dyson were reportedly angered last Friday by a request to return to the workplace at short notice.

One staff member who spoke to the Guardian newspaper said there had been a furious reaction from the workforce. This led to Dyson reversing the decision the next day.

On Friday 15 May, new chief executive Roland Krueger, sent an email, subsequently seen by the Guardian, to employees informing them they should start returning to work in varying shift patterns from Monday. The email was allegedly sent after working hours.

The next day the decision was reversed after the company had “reviewed the practicalities”.

The email stated that staff would be divided into two rotating teams, alternating between home and office working. According to employee accounts this would have meant some employees having to travel to the firm’s Wiltshire factories at Hullavington and Malmesbury, despite being able to work from home.

Steve Turner, assistant general secretary of the Unite trade union, said: “This is an important example of how many employers will interpret weak, unclear and confusing messages about a safe return to work from government.

“In the case of Dyson workers who should still be working from home, they have been able to collectively push back against their employer.

“However, many workers are not as confident or organised and in the same position will be either economically forced back into work, without adequate measures being put in place, or pressured to return under the fear of losing their jobs.”

A spokesperson for Dyson responded: “The health, wellbeing and job security of Dyson people have been our priority throughout the crisis, as we have always made clear. Our campus has remained open throughout as 450 people worked to create Dyson’s ventilator – which mercifully was not needed.

“We have followed the government’s request for manufacturing and research organisations to restart the economy. Those Dyson people who can work from home have been asked to continue to do so, those who require access to equipment on campus can do so in a safe working environment, and those who need occasional attendance on campus are being supported to complete their tasks.

“We are keeping every person on our campus safe, exceeding the government’s guidance, this includes the mandatory wearing of face masks, distancing measures, enhanced cleaning protocols and temperature checking. We have maintained full salaries and benefits, not furloughed any staff and not accepted any Covid-19 financial assistance but, like many companies, are facing a grave economic future.”

Work life after coronavirus

Coronavirus and your workforce webinar: Starting the return to work journey – considerations and challenges

Neill Thomas, partner in the employment department of the specialist law firm Thomas Mansfield, said that all companies must give the return to work process plenty of thought. “Understandably, many employers are desperate to open up their businesses to stave off financial ruin but employees have a range of legal protections in place to protect them from being pushed into returning to work too early or for the wrong reasons,” he said.

“Employers can mitigate the risk of claims to their businesses by conducting workplace risk assessments and considering risk in the light of individual circumstances. Employers need to maintain trust and confidence in their employees.”

These comments were amplified by Mark Harris, lead consultant at risk management and business continuity firm Blindside Risk, who said: “Ill-judged communication about returning to work is unfortunate. Were employees consulted, were union reps consulted? You build up a database of which individuals can work on which days. You get into any issues on a one-to-one basis so you avoid disputes with employees.

Speaking at an online conference on business and pandemic, Harris added: “You do need to go through your scenario planning so you don’t get presented with a workforce saying ’this is not on’.”

He said the pandemic had shown that collaborative approaches needed to be built into crisis management plans.

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more human resources jobs

Adam McCulloch
Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch is a freelance writer and production editor who has worked in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He also works for a national newspaper and is the author of KentWalksNearLondon

previous post
Rural areas see jobs recovery despite nationwide hiring slowdown
next post
How can music improve productivity and focus?

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Tesco to pioneer office space in local stores

13 May 2022

PwC staff to benefit from extended summer hours...

5 May 2022

How hybrid working boosts recruitment but not retention

18 Mar 2022

Commuting by car fast becoming unaffordable

11 Mar 2022

McDonald’s and Coca-Cola to halt operations in Russia

8 Mar 2022

Hays and Shell cut Russia ties but for...

8 Mar 2022

Ukraine and Russia: HR must play key role...

8 Mar 2022

Ikea latest business to shut down in Russia

4 Mar 2022

Storm Eunice forces millions to work from home

18 Feb 2022

Working from home: businesses to allow staff into...

10 Dec 2021
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

TOPICS

Economics, government & business
Employee Relations
Employment law
Equality & diversity
Global HR
HR practice
HR strategy
Learning & training
Occupational health
Pay & benefits
Recruitment & retention
HR Tech
Wellbeing
All HR topics

WHAT’S HOT

Apprenticeship levy
Brexit
Covid-19 coronavirus
Gender pay gap reporting
Gig economy
Holiday pay
HR tech
IR35
Immigration
People analytics
Zero-hours contracts

JOBS

Post a job
Why advertise with us?
Change Management
Compensation & Benefits
Diversity & Inclusion
Employee Relations
Employment Law
Health & Safety
HR (General)
HR Business Partner
HR Director
HR Consultant
HR Shared Services
HR Systems
People Analytics
Learning & Development
Training
Occupational Health
Organisational Development
Payroll
Performance & Engagement
Recruitment & Resourcing
Talent Management
Wellbeing
Workforce Planning

ABOUT

About Personnel Today
Contact us
Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022
RSS feeds
Advertising specifications
Email Newsletters
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards

Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits Awards
Employee Benefits Live

Forum for Expatriate Management

OHW+
OHW+ membership

Whatmedia

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+