Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawAnnual hoursHR practice

Employer-designated days of leave: Sumsion v BBC Scotland, EAT

by Personnel Today 29 May 2007
by Personnel Today 29 May 2007

Mr Sumsion was employed by BBC Scotland as a carpenter for a production set for a 24-week fixed period. He was required to be available for six days each week, and was entitled to six days’ annual leave during the fixed period which, unless otherwise agreed, should be taken “on any sixth non-scheduled day in a week”.

The BBC’s intention was that where he was not required to work on a Saturday (which was taken to be the sixth day in the week), this should be taken as annual leave.

Sumsion wanted to take all his leave in one block before the end of the contract. However, this was rejected. In practice, the BBC required him to take every second Saturday off as leave. Sumsion brought a claim on the basis that the BBC was in breach of the Working Time Regulations (WTR) by operating holiday in this way.

Decision

The tribunal found that the WTR did not restrict an employer’s right to stipulate when leave must be taken, or the duration of that leave. Sumsion appealed. He argued that an employer should not be able to deem Saturday (or Sunday) to be a working day, when in reality, it would not otherwise have been so, and then require leave to be taken on that day.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that Sumsion’s argument was that, effectively, leave days could only be taken on days on which it is determined in advance that the employee will be required to work. The EAT noted that the logical conclusion of this argument would result in teachers being unable to take their statutory holiday in the school holidays. Instead, they would have to take paid leave during term time in addition to the regular holiday periods already taken.

The EAT also found that there was nothing restricting the days that employers could nominate as leave days, nor was there anything preventing those leave days being nominated as single days. Here, Sumsion was being released on alternate Saturdays from his obligation to be available for work. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Key implications 

The EAT made it clear that there was no ‘magic’ about weekends, or a presumption that a leave day should not fall on a weekend if an employee is required to work on weekends.

Had Sumsion succeeded, it would have prevented the practice of closing businesses for a period to give all staff leave at the same time, such as the Christmas shutdown.

The position would have been different if the tribunal had found the arrangement to be a sham – for example, if an employer added an obligation to work an extra day a week for no additional pay – and then designated it a leave day, but that was not the situation here.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Provided employers’ arrangements are clear, operating a system whereby single days of leave are designated by the employer is permissible.

By Michael Powner, partner in the employment and pensions team, Charles Russell




Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Loyalty Management Group to train 50 of its senior and middle managers as in-house coaches
next post
Evolution not revolution: an insider’s view on recruitment in Eastern Europe

You may also like

Ministers loosen fire and rehire proposals in Employment...

10 Jul 2025

Court of Appeal rules that Ryanair agency pilot...

9 Jul 2025

Bereavement leave to extend to miscarriages before 24...

7 Jul 2025

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

With HR absence rising, is your people team...

24 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+