Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Equality, diversity and inclusionFamily-friendly workingLetters

Family-friendly options ­– but who will benefit the most?

by Personnel Today 12 Oct 2004
by Personnel Today 12 Oct 2004

With the General Election expected next year and the parties competing for votes it is no surprise that Patricia Hewitt, secretary of state for trade and industry, is proposing a new raft of employment rights with a family-friendly tinge (News, 5 October).

Few employers will object to extending the right to have a request for flexible work given serious consideration by an employer from parents of young children or employees caring for an elderly or disabled relative. Similarly, most employers will probably agree that bank holidays should not be counted as part of employees’ entitlement to their minimum of four weeks holiday.

The suggestion that women should have the option of transferring some of their paid leave to their partner is more problematic. Some employers might welcome this if it meant that female employees were able to return to work earlier.

Conversely, other employers might be inconvenienced by the temporary absence of male staff taking advantage of their partner’s paid leave. Clear guidelines will be crucial if this measure is introduced.

The Government is considering two other measures: increasing paid paternity leave from £102 a week to 90 per cent of earnings and increasing paid maternity leave from six months to a year.

These measures have two implications for businesses. First, this will add to the burden on affected businesses’ cashflow, because the employer is obliged to pay Statutory Maternity Pay (SMP) and Statutory Paternity Pay (SPP) up front and has to seek reimbursement from the Government later. Second, an increase in these rates of pay could result in more employees being away from work for longer periods of time. This can be disruptive, especially in small businesses. Employers cannot replace a valuable member of staff with a cry of “hey, presto”.

Unemployment is low, there is a strong competition for skilled staff and it is often difficult to find temporary staff cover.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Family-friendly policies must take the interests of business into consideration. Three measures would be beneficial. First, employers need greater certainty about whether an employee will be returning to work after being away on maternity leave. Second, the Government should pay SMP and SPP directly to employees – this would lighten the regulatory burden on employers. And third, some women might prefer six months paid maternity leave at a higher rate than extending the period of paid maternity leave to 12 months. They should have this choice.

Richard Wilson
Head of Business Policy
Institute of Directors

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
SMEs waste golden opportunity to spot new talent
next post
Redefining disability will be painful for employers

You may also like

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer...

23 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

Pride 2025: why corporate allyship still matters

16 Jun 2025

HR is second ‘most sexist profession’ survey suggests

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

Parental leave system is ‘broken’, say MPs

10 Jun 2025

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+