Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Dress codes

Firms lose out on young talent due to bias against visible tattoos

by Personnel Today 21 Sep 2016
by Personnel Today 21 Sep 2016 Racing driver Lewis Hamilton sporting visible tattoos. Pic:Matt Baron/REX/Shutterstock
Racing driver Lewis Hamilton sporting visible tattoos. Pic:Matt Baron/REX/Shutterstock

Employers are missing out on younger talent because of negative attitudes towards visible tattoos at work, according to research published today by workplace experts Acas.

The independent report, Dress codes and appearances at work, found that managers and employees continue to have negative attitudes towards visible tattoos which can sometimes affect recruitment decisions. This is despite the survey by the website Ask finding that almost one in three (29%) 16- to 44-year-olds now have tattoos.

Dress and appearance at work

Dress codes survey 2015

Dress and appearance policy

Both the public and private sector are affected. Public-sector workers feel that people would not have confidence in the professionalism of a person with a visible tattoo.

In the private sector, organisations ranging from law firms to removal companies have concerns about negative attitudes among clients and customers about visible tattoos at work.

Acas has updated its guidance on dress codes in response to the findings and other developments, including the case in May this year of a temporary worker sent home without pay for refusing to wear high heels at work.

Police union wants forces to reconsider bans on visible tattoos

The Acas research follows the call in August from the police staff association, the Police Federation of England and Wales (PFEW), for a consistent, national approach and a “sensible discussion” about the ban in many forces on police officers having tattoos on their hands, neck or faces.

The PFEW is concerned that the ban could be excluding good candidates from joining the force. The federation is conducting research on the attitudes of the police service and the public towards officers with tattoos, with results expected by the end of this month.

The Home Office’s guidance on tattoos says candidates with visible tattoos or facial piercings “may be eligible for appointment” and that each case must be considered on its merits.

The Acas guidance advises the following:

  • Any dress code should not be stricter, or lead to a detriment, for one gender over the other.
  • An employer’s dress code must not be discriminatory in respect of the protected characteristics in the Equality Act 2010 for age, disability, gender reassignment, religion or belief, and sex or sexual orientation.
  • Employers may adopt a more casual approach to dress during the summer, but this may depend on the type of business.
  • It is good practice when drafting or updating a dress code for an employer to consider the reasoning behind it. Consulting with employees over any proposed dress code may ensure that it is acceptable to both the organisation and employees.

Acas head of equality Stephen Williams said: “Businesses are perfectly within their right to have rules around appearance at work, but these rules should be based on the law where appropriate, and the needs of the business, not managers’ personal preferences.

“We know that employers with a diverse workforce can reap many business benefits as they can tap into the knowledge and skills of staff from a wide range of backgrounds.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“Almost one-third of young people now have tattoos so, whilst it remains a legitimate business decision, a dress code that restricts people with tattoos might mean companies are missing out on talented workers.”

The Acas independent research was carried out at King’s College, London.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Modern slavery statements: September deadline looms
next post
Visible tattoos: time to relax policies on employee appearance?

You may also like

Police Scotland turns away tasteless tattoos

10 Mar 2025

Employers shun strict dress codes as culture shifts

15 Jan 2025

Jet2 flight attendant who quit job in haircut...

1 Aug 2024

Civil service EDI jobs, spending and networks to...

13 May 2024

British Army ends beard ban

2 Apr 2024

Bare below elbows: Muslim medic loses religious discrimination...

27 Mar 2024

Pyjama couture still reigns supreme in the world...

24 Nov 2023

Butlin’s aims for ‘positive, inclusive’ look with new...

20 Oct 2023

NHS Trust dismissed woman who was subject to...

6 Oct 2023

Sultry September raises dress code dilemmas

8 Sep 2023

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+