Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Dress codes

Firms lose out on young talent due to bias against visible tattoos

by Personnel Today 21 Sep 2016
by Personnel Today 21 Sep 2016 Racing driver Lewis Hamilton sporting visible tattoos. Pic:Matt Baron/REX/Shutterstock
Racing driver Lewis Hamilton sporting visible tattoos. Pic:Matt Baron/REX/Shutterstock

Employers are missing out on younger talent because of negative attitudes towards visible tattoos at work, according to research published today by workplace experts Acas.

The independent report, Dress codes and appearances at work, found that managers and employees continue to have negative attitudes towards visible tattoos which can sometimes affect recruitment decisions. This is despite the survey by the website Ask finding that almost one in three (29%) 16- to 44-year-olds now have tattoos.

Dress and appearance at work

Dress codes survey 2015

Dress and appearance policy

Both the public and private sector are affected. Public-sector workers feel that people would not have confidence in the professionalism of a person with a visible tattoo.

In the private sector, organisations ranging from law firms to removal companies have concerns about negative attitudes among clients and customers about visible tattoos at work.

Acas has updated its guidance on dress codes in response to the findings and other developments, including the case in May this year of a temporary worker sent home without pay for refusing to wear high heels at work.

Police union wants forces to reconsider bans on visible tattoos

The Acas research follows the call in August from the police staff association, the Police Federation of England and Wales (PFEW), for a consistent, national approach and a “sensible discussion” about the ban in many forces on police officers having tattoos on their hands, neck or faces.

The PFEW is concerned that the ban could be excluding good candidates from joining the force. The federation is conducting research on the attitudes of the police service and the public towards officers with tattoos, with results expected by the end of this month.

The Home Office’s guidance on tattoos says candidates with visible tattoos or facial piercings “may be eligible for appointment” and that each case must be considered on its merits.

The Acas guidance advises the following:

  • Any dress code should not be stricter, or lead to a detriment, for one gender over the other.
  • An employer’s dress code must not be discriminatory in respect of the protected characteristics in the Equality Act 2010 for age, disability, gender reassignment, religion or belief, and sex or sexual orientation.
  • Employers may adopt a more casual approach to dress during the summer, but this may depend on the type of business.
  • It is good practice when drafting or updating a dress code for an employer to consider the reasoning behind it. Consulting with employees over any proposed dress code may ensure that it is acceptable to both the organisation and employees.

Acas head of equality Stephen Williams said: “Businesses are perfectly within their right to have rules around appearance at work, but these rules should be based on the law where appropriate, and the needs of the business, not managers’ personal preferences.

“We know that employers with a diverse workforce can reap many business benefits as they can tap into the knowledge and skills of staff from a wide range of backgrounds.

“Almost one-third of young people now have tattoos so, whilst it remains a legitimate business decision, a dress code that restricts people with tattoos might mean companies are missing out on talented workers.”

The Acas independent research was carried out at King’s College, London.

Personnel Today
Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Modern slavery statements: September deadline looms
next post
Visible tattoos: time to relax policies on employee appearance?

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Christian awarded £22k following dismissal over religious necklace

24 Jun 2022

Boris Johnson’s partygate fixed penalty notice: any lessons...

14 Apr 2022

Christian nurse dismissed for wearing cross necklace wins...

6 Jan 2022

Office etiquette: time to stamp out pandemic ‘bad...

17 Sep 2021

Nursery worker asked to show less cleavage loses...

15 Sep 2021

Does the ‘new normal’ mean a new dress...

10 Sep 2021

Summer 2021: six potential issues for employers

20 Jul 2021

Headscarf ruling is a blow to inclusion

20 Jul 2021

European court allows employers to ban religious clothing

16 Jul 2021

Disney drops dress requirements in inclusion drive

15 Apr 2021
  • 6 reasons why work-based learning is better than traditional training PROMOTED | A recent Fortune/Deloitte survey found that 71% of CEOs are anticipating that this year’s biggest business disrupter...Read more
  • Strengthening Scotland’s public services through virtual recruiting PROMOTED | This website is Scotland's go-to place for job seekers looking to apply for roles in public services...Read more
  • What’s next for L&D? Enter Alchemist… PROMOTED | It’s time to turn off the tedious and get ready for interactive and immersive learning experiences...Read more
  • Simple mistakes are blighting the onboarding experience PROMOTED | The onboarding of new hires is a company’s best chance...Read more
  • Preventing Burnout: How can HR help key workers get the right help? PROMOTED | Workplace wellbeing may seem a distant memory...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+