Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

BonusesLatest NewsPay & benefits

Former Birmingham City Council boss accused of ‘fireproofing’ bonuses

by Personnel Today 18 Nov 2009
by Personnel Today 18 Nov 2009

A former Birmingham City Council boss has been accused of “fireproofing” bonuses for male employees so they wouldn’t lose them when an equal pay initiative was enforced, an employment tribunal heard.


Margaret Wells, former assistant director of Trading Services, had transferred the bonuses enjoyed by cemetery operatives as part of a modernisation of the authority’s Bereavement Service, so as not to lose them when the Single Status initiative took effect, it is claimed.


Speaking at a tribunal where more than 4,000 council employees, predominantly women, are fighting for compensation over equal pay, Wells said she and other managers had attended several meetings on equal pay years before the implementation of the Single Status agreement, the Birmingham Post reports.


“We were looking at how and where the bonuses existed and dealing with them in relation to equal pay,” she said.


But Daphne Romney QC, representing the claimants, said: “You were not looking for where the bonuses were – you knew where they were in 1989. What they were looking at was how to keep them in such a way that they would not be lost in future under Single Status.


“Part of the concept of redesign was to fireproof the men’s pay, because you knew at some point the implementation of Single Status would remove the bonus.”


Ms Romney QC also accused the authority of misleading the public on the subject of bonuses for workers in Bereavement Services. “In order to keep your men on bonuses, you were told that bonuses should not be called bonuses. In 2004 [following a review of the service] you called it basic pay, even though it was 40% higher than the previous wage.”


Last year the authority adopted the Single Status agreement in a bid to remove discrepancies in wages and enhancements between men and women.


Lawyers claim that for many years workers in male-dominated posts, such as grave digging, gardening and refuse collection, were paid bonuses for work equal to that delivered by cleaners, care workers and teaching assistants who were not paid bonuses.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Legal experts are now seeking up to £100,000 compensation for each client in back-dated bonus payments.


The tribunal continues.

Personnel Today

previous post
T-Mobile employee faces prosecution after selling customer data
next post
Corporate Bribery Bill to be announced in Queen’s Speech

You may also like

FCA issues clarity on workplace savings schemes to...

27 Aug 2025

MoD worker loses harassment claim over lack of...

27 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

TUC calls for ‘step change’ as half worry...

27 Aug 2025

Poundland avoids collapse as restructure approved

27 Aug 2025

London hotel housekeepers call off strike action

27 Aug 2025

Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain...

27 Aug 2025

Indeed launches platform aimed at healthcare workers

27 Aug 2025

Café worker awarded £22k after being too cold...

26 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise