Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Equality, diversity and inclusionEqual pay

Gender pay gap publication amnesty will have little effect on employers

by Kat Baker 21 Jan 2010
by Kat Baker 21 Jan 2010

A two-year amnesty from investigation for firms that publish their gender pay gaps will do little to spur employers into carrying out audits voluntarily, HR professionals have warned.


Employers have told Personnel Today they are unlikely to publish the difference in earnings between male and female employees unless it was mandatory to do so, for fear the figures could damage their reputation and their ability to attract recruits.


The warning comes after the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) announced it would refrain from investigating employers found guilty of habouring a gender pay gap for up to two years if those organisations published the information voluntarily.


The move was outlined in an EHRC report to encourage employers to conduct equal pay audits. But Gillian Williams, head of HR at data management firm GB Group, told the magazine unless organisations were forced to publish pay gap details, they were unlikely to bother.


“The two-year amnesty is not a big enough incentive to publish,” she said. “Doing so would draw attention to something which employers have all the best intentions to resolve. If people can see the data it could affect recruitment and the morale of existing employees. Most employers will hold off until it becomes mandatory.”









Publishing pay gaps: What other HR chiefs think


Jane Hodgen, head of talent management and corporate sustainability, Tata Consulting Services: “Having their names published on a scale will incentivise them as organisations will all want to be the best. The best way to get change is to get employers to compete with their peers.”


Manjit Sandhu, head of HR, New Forest District Council: “I think the two years is helpful as it provides some time to make changes. Employers will take the opportunity to do that.”


Brad Skinner, head of HR at Barclays bank, added employers would likely weigh up the risk of being investigated by the EHRC against the damage publishing the data could do to companies.


He said: “If the EHRC picks off random companies the odds of being investigated will be small, and employers will weigh up their chances of being investigated. The incentive versus the odds of being investigated don’t quite balance out.”


Firms were also concerned that even under the EHRC proposals, they could still face employment tribunal claims over their pay data.


Trevor Phillips, EHRC chairman, said: “If an employer doesn’t look at their own gender pay gap, how do they address it? By understanding that they have a gender pay gap problem they can start to take steps to address it.”


A clause in the Equality Bill could make it mandatory for organisations to publish their gender pay gap by 2013.

Avatar
Kat Baker

previous post
Train to Gain scheme comes under fire from group of MPs
next post
Haiti earthquake response staff traumatised by experience

You may also like

Female graduates’ starting salary lower than men’s

1 Jun 2023

Leaked emails suggest RAF disadvantaged white male applicants

31 May 2023

Hybrid working: Combatting loneliness and enabling inclusion

31 May 2023

Top five findings on DEI and how to...

31 May 2023

Whitehall accused of ‘racist bias’ in civil service...

30 May 2023

Carer’s Leave Bill receives Royal Assent

25 May 2023

Half of HR leaders lack data for pay...

17 May 2023

Goldman Sachs to pay $215m sex discrimination settlement

10 May 2023

Employment bodies IES and IPA to merge

27 Apr 2023

Active Inclusion: The story behind Capgemini’s EDI campaign...

25 Apr 2023

  • The HR Bundle: Your one-stop guide to building a successful global HR Department PROMOTED | Get your hands on Deel’s free HR bundle...Read more
  • The Benefits of an Employee Assistance Programme PROMOTED | EAPs support employees in a range of ways...Read more
  • Intergenerational working and how to manage up and down the generations PROMOTED | The benefits and challenges of intergenerational workplaces...Read more
  • Bereavement in the workplace: How training can help HR get it right PROMOTED | HR professionals play an essential role...Read more
  • UK workforce mental wellbeing needs PROMOTED | The mental wellbeing support employers are providing misses the mark...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+