Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Economics, government & businessHR practice

General Election 2010: Keep politics out of the workplace

by Richard Staines 12 Apr 2010
by Richard Staines 12 Apr 2010

As the election debate gets going and politics receives almost blanket coverage on the television and the internet, it is likely to dominate the public agenda until 6 May and beyond – but what if it begins to encroach on the workplace?







Politics in the workplace: employers’ top five questions



What are the benefits for employers of having a policy on political activities in the workplace?

Can an employee be dismissed for being a member of an extreme political party, for example the BNP?

Can an employer prevent employees from political campaigning at the workplace in support of a particular party?

Can an employer prevent employees from displaying support for a particular political party at work, for example by wearing a badge or t-shirt?

How should an employer deal with a complaint from an employee that a colleague is expressing political views that he or she finds offensive?

 


In the public sector, many posts are politically restricted, and employees are duty-bound to remain politically neutral at work. But do private sector employers have the right to impose bans on employees expressing political views in the workplace?

What if employees take it even further and start campaigning for a particular political party, with the risk that they will offend colleagues who hold different political views?

Draw clear lines

Graham White, HR director at Westminster City Council, says that employers have a right to outline the appropriate behaviours expected from employees – but this should not overlook their rights under to express themselves under the Human Rights Act.

“We need to balance the need to allow our staff the right to express themselves while ensuring this is done in a manner that is neither offensive nor inappropriate,” he says.

Philip Hodges, associate at employment law firm, Halliwells, says the matter should be treated like any other disciplinary issue: if an employee’s behaviour is disrupting other people, then they can be disciplined by line managers.

“If anything you start to do disrupts people doing what they are paid to do, the employer is within their rights to put a stop to it and address it in the same way as any other potential disciplinary matter. If they are promoting a political party and it is interfering with their duties it can be addressed in the same way as anything else,” says Hodges.

Ban electioneering

Employers do have the right to ban electioneering, such as distributing political leaflets or promoting candidates, in the workplace, adds White.

“In principle an employer does have the right to ban electioneering in the workplace. The key issue here is defining electioneering. An employer is perfectly entitled to ban any form of electioneering on the premises where this is clearly speech-making or displaying or handing out leaflets.”

However, says Hodges that such a strategy will not be necessary in most workplaces. “A policy banning political activity would be using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. By way of guidance, some sort of memo or e-mail stating that it would be to the benefit of all that you leave politics out of the workplace is fine. But it also must state that if anybody has strong feelings about this, they should contact HR,” says Hodges.

Get HR involved

Giving employees the option to contact HR would prevent them being able to claim discrimination under the Human Rights Act at a tribunal, says Hodges.

Case law in this matter is, however, unclear following the Nicholson v Grainger case, which last year accepted environmentalism as a belief. This decision was upheld at an Employment Appeal Tribunal earlier this year.

Although Hodges says that in many cases, complainants would struggle to argue that political beliefs should be treated in the same way as religious beliefs, the case does open the door for litigation if employees are not treated fairly. “The potential for litigation is there,” he warns.

Beware extremism

But what if employees are expressing support for more extreme political parties, such as the BNP?

In his review of racism in schools, published last month, former chief inspector of schools Maurice Smith said that banning teachers from joining the BNP was not necessary because levels of racism are low.

The Association of Chief Prison Officers and HM Prison Service have already banned BNP members from joining their ranks.

However, HR and legal experts say that this may not be appropriate in other work settings.

White explains: “Such actions could not simply be predicated on a particular political affiliation. The example of police officers results from the different employment relationship a constable holds and as such is not a natural comparator with a more general employment relationship.”

However, he adds that any expression of racist views should be dealt with robustly. “Where the display of political adornments or expression of political views intimidates or harasses any section of employees, management is empowered to remove the reason for the offence,” he says.

But White adds: “This is unlikely to include the frustration of an employment contract unless the individual fails to comply with the management request.”

Vanessa Robinson, head of HR practice and development at the CIPD, agrees: “If such views are voiced in the workplace, or associated with the organisation where the employee works, they could have potential negative impact on both other employees and the reputation of the organisation itself.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“We suggest that organisations need to have in place clear policies setting out what is acceptable and managers then need to stay alert to views and opinions of employees in the work place and to deal with them on a case-by-case basis as needed.”

Clearly, the election process could have an impact on workplaces across the country – and HR departments must be prepared.

Richard Staines

previous post
BA strikes cut passenger numbers by 200,000 in March
next post
ASBOs in the boardroom!

You may also like

MPs demand Home Office tightens visas to protect...

4 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

Fall in entry-level jobs linked to rise of...

30 Jun 2025

Bank of England says NIC rise is dampening...

27 Jun 2025

Bioethanol plant closure could lead to 4,000 job...

26 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

With HR absence rising, is your people team...

24 Jun 2025

Skills receive £1.2bn boost in new industrial strategy

23 Jun 2025

Employees want more upskilling and apprenticeships to narrow...

20 Jun 2025

UK job market shows signs of resilience

20 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+