Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employee relationsEmployment lawDispute resolutionEconomics, government & businessIndustrial action / strikes

GMB accuses employers of dirty tricks to skip redundancy payouts

by Personnel Today 9 Mar 2009
by Personnel Today 9 Mar 2009

UK firms are employing unscrupulous practices to push people out of the workplace and avoid redundancy costs, the GMB union has claimed.

The union told Employers’ Law that one major company is trying to force employees to sign away their redundancy rights by giving them the stark choice: sign up now or be sacked. Workers receive a cash lump sum of £8,000 to £12,000, claimed the GMB, as long as they sign an agreement that waives their right to a tribunal appeal and any form of redundancy payment.

Paul Maloney, senior organiser with the GMB, said some employers were deliberately ignoring proper consultation and selection processes, and drawing up hit lists of individuals to remove older workers and those with poor health records from the payroll.

“It is not redundancy. It is simply a way of saving themselves money and pushing people out of the door in a cheaper way,” he added.

Figures from the Citizens Advice Bureau, meanwhile, show that dismissal enquiries rose by 14% between April and December 2008 compared with the same period in 2007, largely because of questions about redundancy practices.

Speaking to Employers’ Law about these issues, Simon Bond, head of employment at Midlands law firm Challinors, said the firm is dealing with an increasing number of similar cases.

“A commonly used ‘trick’ is to lay off staff indefinitely in the hope that they will simply get alternative employment elsewhere and not pursue their legal entitlements,” he said.

Mike Emmott, employee relations adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, also said that compromise agreements and other alternatives to redundancy need to be better explained to show they are not necessarily so poorly-motivated as first appears.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“Compromise agreements, in particular, are a useful safety valve for the tribunal system and as a way for employers to resolve any tensions in a working relationship,” he said.

“They are often used where there is no obvious basis for a legal challenge but the employer wants to protect themselves, predict costs or part company with an employee on decent terms. It simply says: I will give the employee X thousand pounds and in return the employee will agree they are content.”

Personnel Today

previous post
Public sector pensioners out of pocket
next post
International employment law news

You may also like

Submarine programme to supports thousands of jobs

2 Jun 2025

Glass half full – or empty? Contrasting takes...

2 Jun 2025

House of Lords to resume scrutiny of Employment...

30 May 2025

Indefinite leave to remain proposal could place workers...

30 May 2025

Overseas workers bring key benefits to IT and...

30 May 2025

Black workers face greatest risk from workplace surveillance

30 May 2025

Warning issued over loss of ‘frictionless’ business travel...

29 May 2025

Streeting appeals to resident doctors to vote against...

29 May 2025

Recruitment outlook improves, despite employment law fears

29 May 2025

KFC to create over 7,000 jobs

28 May 2025

  • Preparing for a new era of workforce planning (webinar) WEBINAR | Employers now face...Read more
  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+