Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Gender pay gap

Some gender pay gap reporting “statistically improbable”

by Rob Moss 8 Dec 2017
by Rob Moss 8 Dec 2017 Hugo Boss at New York Fashion Week. In the UK the company changed its gender pay gap submission from a mean of 0% to 33% after an investigation by the FT. Photo: Stephen Lovekin/WWD/REX/Shutterstock
Hugo Boss at New York Fashion Week. In the UK the company changed its gender pay gap submission from a mean of 0% to 33% after an investigation by the FT. Photo: Stephen Lovekin/WWD/REX/Shutterstock

Companies submitting their gender pay gaps are getting their sums wrong and providing statistically impossible numbers, according to an equal pay expert at a law firm.

Lorraine Heard of Womble Bond Dickinson believes the problem is more serious than revealed today in an FT investigation into the accuracy of the gender pay gap submissions made so far by 322 organisations.

Gender pay gap reporting

How to measure and report a gender pay gap

The FT has today reported that more than 5% of the UK companies to have submitted their gender pay gap data have recorded information that is statistically improbable and therefore “almost certainly inaccurate”.

The organisations identified include A Kahn Restaurants, which is a McDonald’s franchise; the north Tyneside branch of Age UK; and Dana UK Axle, a car part manufacturer.

One company, Hugo Boss, which employs 900 people in the UK, initially reported that it had no pay gap of any kind between what it paid men and women. It also said that it had 53% men and 47% of women in each of the four pay quartiles and that all employees received a bonus.

After the FT pointed out to Hugo Boss that its results were unusual, the fashion house resubmitted its data this time recording a mean gender pay gap of 33% and a median gender pay gap of 77%.

In total, 16 companies reported that male and female staff were paid exactly the same, so they had 0% gender pay gap measured by both the mean and median.

“Whilst it is not impossible for a company to have a zero gender pay gap it is highly improbable that the gap would be zero when measured on both a mean and a median basis,” said Heard.

“Some companies are publishing gender bonus gaps of more than 100%.  This is simply not possible if the calculations are completed correctly… The fact that some organisations are reporting a positive gender bonus gap in excess of 100% reveals that not all employers are doing their sums right.”

Womble Bond Dickinson also suggested that companies were coming unstuck due to:

  • the incorrect handling of salary sacrifice schemes;
  • the potential for different approaches for comparing employees with irregular working hours;
  • the inaccurate handling of incentive and other payments that fall within the statutory definition of ‘bonuses’;
  • confusion regarding the correct handling of bonus payments that should be included as part of the gender pay gap figures, in addition to the gender bonus gap figures.

Of the estimated 9,000 private employers who have more than 250 employees (with more in the public sector), 322 organisations have published their gender pay gap figures to date.

“There is no point in having transparency in gender pay unless all organisations are confident that they are entering a level playing field when they publish their results,” added Heard.

Rob Moss
Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. He specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts, most recently on the challenges created by the coronavirus pandemic. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and electrical markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
EU citizens’ rights confirmed in Brexit agreement
next post
Primark and Sports Direct top minimum wage underpayment ranking

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Gender pensions gap: half of women expect to...

9 May 2022

Twice as many men as women hold company...

3 May 2022

Disability pay gap wider than in 2014

29 Apr 2022

Avoid salary history questions in recruitment, guide urges

29 Apr 2022

Hundreds left to report as 2022 gender pay...

5 Apr 2022

Top 10 HR questions March 2022: is long...

1 Apr 2022

Public sector organisations yet to report as gender...

1 Apr 2022

Half yet to publish as gender pay gap...

29 Mar 2022

April 2022 employment law changes: six tasks for...

14 Mar 2022

International Women’s Day: Is the gender pay gap...

9 Mar 2022
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+