Legal judgment date for Heyday challenge to mandatory retirement age slips towards 2009

Employers have been warned against complacency over the legal challenge to the mandatory retirement age, after the expected date for a verdict slipped towards 2009.

Solicitors acting for Heyday, the Age Concern group behind the challenge, admitted that ongoing legal arguments have postponed a European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision for at least another 18 months.

But, with a survey revealing that three in four small firms have made no provision for staff wishing to work beyond 65, lawyers said such companies were risking retrospective legal action.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

Email(Required)

OptOut

From time to time, we will send you emails about selected products, events and services from Personnel Today and OHW+ - but you can choose to opt-out at any time. If you do not wish to receive these emails, please tick this box.

Comments

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Δ

The UK High Court ruled in December 2006 that the Heyday case against the Department of Trade and Industry should be referred to the ECJ. Solicitors for the two parties were expected to agree on a list of questions for referral by January, but are still arguing over the wording.

Andrew Lockley, solicitor at Irwin Mitchell, which is acting for Heyday, said: “Companies making people retire are leaving themselves open to legal risk.”